PRESENT APPROACHES TO LANDSCAPE TYPOLOGY IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11310%2F12%3A10129568" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11310/12:10129568 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10285-012-0057-5" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10285-012-0057-5</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10285-012-0057-5" target="_blank" >10.2478/v10285-012-0057-5</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

PRESENT APPROACHES TO LANDSCAPE TYPOLOGY IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Landscape typologies are widely recognised as useful tools for landscape management and planning. However, there is wide range of different approaches producing diverse outputs, which makes the usage of landscape typologies sometimes difficult or confusing in general practice (Wascher ed., 2005). The same situation is found in the Czech Republic, where a number of holistic, expert-based and quantitative approaches were developed. These differences could be explained by different objectives of landscapeclassification, different input data and methods used, and by the particular author's experience and erudition. Nevertheless, landscape typology should be clear both for scientists, landscape-planners and policy makers. It is necessary to create valid landscape-planning documents which have to reflect regional, cultural and natural landscape specifics, for as effective and sustainable land use as possible. For such a strategic planning, clearly defined and characterised spatial units see

Název v anglickém jazyce

PRESENT APPROACHES TO LANDSCAPE TYPOLOGY IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC

Popis výsledku anglicky

Landscape typologies are widely recognised as useful tools for landscape management and planning. However, there is wide range of different approaches producing diverse outputs, which makes the usage of landscape typologies sometimes difficult or confusing in general practice (Wascher ed., 2005). The same situation is found in the Czech Republic, where a number of holistic, expert-based and quantitative approaches were developed. These differences could be explained by different objectives of landscapeclassification, different input data and methods used, and by the particular author's experience and erudition. Nevertheless, landscape typology should be clear both for scientists, landscape-planners and policy makers. It is necessary to create valid landscape-planning documents which have to reflect regional, cultural and natural landscape specifics, for as effective and sustainable land use as possible. For such a strategic planning, clearly defined and characterised spatial units see

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

DO - Ochrana krajinných území

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2012

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Journal of Landscape Ecology

ISSN

1803-2427

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

5

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

11

Strana od-do

24-35

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—