Timed surveys and transect walks as comparable methods for monitoring butterflies in small plots
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11310%2F12%3A10131626" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11310/12:10131626 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/60077344:_____/12:00379326 RIV/60076658:12310/12:43883634 RIV/60460709:41330/12:54731
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10841-011-9414-7" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10841-011-9414-7</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10841-011-9414-7" target="_blank" >10.1007/s10841-011-9414-7</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Timed surveys and transect walks as comparable methods for monitoring butterflies in small plots
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Butterflies are widely used in biodiversity surveys, and several methods of relative abundance counts have been developed. The most frequently used linear transects are praised for a good replicability, but recently have been criticised for poor speciesdetecting ability, especially for poorly visible or extremely sedentary species. As an alternative, timed surveys, based on zigzagging study sites and flexibly checking transient butterfly resources, have been proposed by some authors. We tested the utility of the two methods while studying the effect of restoration practices on butterfly assemblages in limestone quarries in the Czech Republic. Numbers of species and individuals detected per 10 min transect walk were compared with numbers of species andindividuals detected during 10 min timed survey. Mobile and imperceptible species were compared in separate analyses as a measure of detection efficiency. More species and individuals per visit were recorded by timed surveys. No differen
Název v anglickém jazyce
Timed surveys and transect walks as comparable methods for monitoring butterflies in small plots
Popis výsledku anglicky
Butterflies are widely used in biodiversity surveys, and several methods of relative abundance counts have been developed. The most frequently used linear transects are praised for a good replicability, but recently have been criticised for poor speciesdetecting ability, especially for poorly visible or extremely sedentary species. As an alternative, timed surveys, based on zigzagging study sites and flexibly checking transient butterfly resources, have been proposed by some authors. We tested the utility of the two methods while studying the effect of restoration practices on butterfly assemblages in limestone quarries in the Czech Republic. Numbers of species and individuals detected per 10 min transect walk were compared with numbers of species andindividuals detected during 10 min timed survey. Mobile and imperceptible species were compared in separate analyses as a measure of detection efficiency. More species and individuals per visit were recorded by timed surveys. No differen
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
EG - Zoologie
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
Výsledek vznikl pri realizaci vícero projektů. Více informací v záložce Projekty.
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2012
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Journal of Insect Conservation
ISSN
1366-638X
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
16
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
2
Stát vydavatele periodika
NL - Nizozemsko
Počet stran výsledku
6
Strana od-do
275-280
Kód UT WoS článku
000301588900011
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—