Dental Age Assessment in Children: A Comparison of Four Methods in a Recent French Population
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11310%2F13%3A10145788" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11310/13:10145788 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.12221" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.12221</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.12221" target="_blank" >10.1111/1556-4029.12221</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Dental Age Assessment in Children: A Comparison of Four Methods in a Recent French Population
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The aim of this study was to analyze the accuracy and the reliability of four methods of dental age estimation (Demirjian, Willems I, Willems II, and Chaillet standards) in a French population. Orthopantomograms of 743 children aged between 4 and 15 years were used. The Demirjian standards gave a consistent overestimation of dental age compared with chronological age (+0.45 and +0.46years for girls and boys, respectively). We found that three modified methods were more accurate for both sexes than Demirjian's method: the Willems I method appeared to be more suitable when the sex and ethnicity are both known (-0.09 and +0.14years for girls and boys, respectively); the Willems II method was more accurate for children of unknown sex (mean difference=0.00years), and the Chaillet method was found to be more accurate than the Demirjian method, but less accurate than the Willems I method (-0.59 and -0.18years for girls and boys, respectively).
Název v anglickém jazyce
Dental Age Assessment in Children: A Comparison of Four Methods in a Recent French Population
Popis výsledku anglicky
The aim of this study was to analyze the accuracy and the reliability of four methods of dental age estimation (Demirjian, Willems I, Willems II, and Chaillet standards) in a French population. Orthopantomograms of 743 children aged between 4 and 15 years were used. The Demirjian standards gave a consistent overestimation of dental age compared with chronological age (+0.45 and +0.46years for girls and boys, respectively). We found that three modified methods were more accurate for both sexes than Demirjian's method: the Willems I method appeared to be more suitable when the sex and ethnicity are both known (-0.09 and +0.14years for girls and boys, respectively); the Willems II method was more accurate for children of unknown sex (mean difference=0.00years), and the Chaillet method was found to be more accurate than the Demirjian method, but less accurate than the Willems I method (-0.59 and -0.18years for girls and boys, respectively).
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
AC - Archeologie, antropologie, etnologie
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2013
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Journal of Forensic Sciences
ISSN
0022-1198
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
58
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
5
Stát vydavatele periodika
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
Počet stran výsledku
7
Strana od-do
1341-1347
Kód UT WoS článku
000323894200034
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—