Analysis and expert assessment of the semantic similarity between land cover classes

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11310%2F14%3A10282041" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11310/14:10282041 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/49777513:23520/14:43926686

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0309133314532001" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0309133314532001</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0309133314532001" target="_blank" >10.1177/0309133314532001</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Analysis and expert assessment of the semantic similarity between land cover classes

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Products of CORINE Land Cover (CLC), the National Land Cover Dataset (NLCD), the FAO/UNEP Land Cover Classification System (LCCS), etc. currently provide an important source of information used for the assessment of issues such as landscape change, landscape fragmentation and the planning of urbanization. Assuming that the data from these various databases are often used in searching for solutions to environmental problems, it is necessary to know which classes of different databases exist and to what extent they are similar, i.e. their possible compatibility and interchangeability. An expert assessment of the similarity between the CLC and NLCD 1992 nomenclatures is presented. Such a similarity assessment in comparison with the 'geometric model', the'feature model' and the 'network model' is not frequently used. The results obtained show the similarity of assessments completed by four experts who marked the degree of similarity between the compared land cover classes by 1 (almost sim

Název v anglickém jazyce

Analysis and expert assessment of the semantic similarity between land cover classes

Popis výsledku anglicky

Products of CORINE Land Cover (CLC), the National Land Cover Dataset (NLCD), the FAO/UNEP Land Cover Classification System (LCCS), etc. currently provide an important source of information used for the assessment of issues such as landscape change, landscape fragmentation and the planning of urbanization. Assuming that the data from these various databases are often used in searching for solutions to environmental problems, it is necessary to know which classes of different databases exist and to what extent they are similar, i.e. their possible compatibility and interchangeability. An expert assessment of the similarity between the CLC and NLCD 1992 nomenclatures is presented. Such a similarity assessment in comparison with the 'geometric model', the'feature model' and the 'network model' is not frequently used. The results obtained show the similarity of assessments completed by four experts who marked the degree of similarity between the compared land cover classes by 1 (almost sim

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

DE - Zemský magnetismus, geodesie, geografie

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

Výsledek vznikl pri realizaci vícero projektů. Více informací v záložce Projekty.

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2014

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Progress in Physical Geography

ISSN

0309-1333

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

38

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

27

Strana od-do

301-327

Kód UT WoS článku

000337562200004

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—