Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Defence strategies of Chrysomela lapponica (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) larvae: relative efficacy of secreted and stored defences against insect and avian predators

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11310%2F18%3A10379153" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11310/18:10379153 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/bly045" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/bly045</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/bly045" target="_blank" >10.1093/biolinnean/bly045</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Defence strategies of Chrysomela lapponica (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) larvae: relative efficacy of secreted and stored defences against insect and avian predators

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    Larvae of the leaf beetle Chrysomela lapponica defend themselves by release of repellent secretions, but also store potentially toxic compounds in their body tissues. We addressed the role of major groups of predators in the evolution of these two defence strategies by testing effects of these strategies on the behaviour of insect (wood ant, Formica polyctena) and avian (great tit, Parus major) predators. Ants were repelled by larval defensive secretions, but not by larvae devoid of secretions, larval haemolymph or integument. By contrast, birds rejected larvae devoid of secretions after the first attack; this suggests the presence of non-volatile defensive compounds within the larval body. However, survival was three-fold greater for larvae with intact secretions than for larvae with depleted secretions due to (1) irritating effects of secretions, resulting in frequent release of undamaged prey, and (2) faster avoidance learning and better prey memorability based on contact with secretions. Thus, volatile secretions and non-volatile compounds stored in the body act against birds jointly. Secretions sequestered from host plants were more effective than were autogenously produced secretions. We conclude that insect predators could contribute to the evolution of secreted but not of stored defensive chemicals, whereas bird predation could favour the evolution of both lines of defence.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Defence strategies of Chrysomela lapponica (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) larvae: relative efficacy of secreted and stored defences against insect and avian predators

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    Larvae of the leaf beetle Chrysomela lapponica defend themselves by release of repellent secretions, but also store potentially toxic compounds in their body tissues. We addressed the role of major groups of predators in the evolution of these two defence strategies by testing effects of these strategies on the behaviour of insect (wood ant, Formica polyctena) and avian (great tit, Parus major) predators. Ants were repelled by larval defensive secretions, but not by larvae devoid of secretions, larval haemolymph or integument. By contrast, birds rejected larvae devoid of secretions after the first attack; this suggests the presence of non-volatile defensive compounds within the larval body. However, survival was three-fold greater for larvae with intact secretions than for larvae with depleted secretions due to (1) irritating effects of secretions, resulting in frequent release of undamaged prey, and (2) faster avoidance learning and better prey memorability based on contact with secretions. Thus, volatile secretions and non-volatile compounds stored in the body act against birds jointly. Secretions sequestered from host plants were more effective than were autogenously produced secretions. We conclude that insect predators could contribute to the evolution of secreted but not of stored defensive chemicals, whereas bird predation could favour the evolution of both lines of defence.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    10613 - Zoology

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

    <a href="/cs/project/GAP505%2F11%2F1459" target="_blank" >GAP505/11/1459: Faktory ovlivňující variabilitu v reakcích predátorů na aposematickou kořist</a><br>

  • Návaznosti

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2018

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Biological Journal of the Linnean Society

  • ISSN

    0024-4066

  • e-ISSN

  • Svazek periodika

    124

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    3

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

  • Počet stran výsledku

    14

  • Strana od-do

    533-546

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    000442934800018

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-85050766767