The more-individuals hypothesis revisited: the role of community abundance in species richness regulation and the productivity-diversity relationship
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11310%2F18%3A10386090" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11310/18:10386090 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/00216208:11620/18:10386090
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12941" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12941</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ele.12941" target="_blank" >10.1111/ele.12941</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
The more-individuals hypothesis revisited: the role of community abundance in species richness regulation and the productivity-diversity relationship
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Species richness increases with energy availability, yet there is little consensus as to the exact processes driving this species-energy relationship. The most straightforward explanation is the more-individuals hypothesis (MIH). It states that higher energy availability promotes a higher total number of individuals in a community, which consequently increases species richness by allowing for a greater number of species with viable populations. Empirical support for the MIH is mixed, partially due to the lack of proper formalisation of the MIH and consequent confusion as to its exact predictions. Here, we review the evidence of the MIH and evaluate the reliability of various predictions that have been tested. There is only limited evidence that spatial variation in species richness is driven by variation in the total number of individuals. There are also problems with measures of energy availability, with scale-dependence, and with the direction of causality, as the total number of individuals may sometimes itself be driven by the number of species. However, even in such a case the total number of individuals may be involved in diversity regulation. We propose a formal theory that encompasses these processes, clarifying how the different factors affecting diversity dynamics can be disentangled.
Název v anglickém jazyce
The more-individuals hypothesis revisited: the role of community abundance in species richness regulation and the productivity-diversity relationship
Popis výsledku anglicky
Species richness increases with energy availability, yet there is little consensus as to the exact processes driving this species-energy relationship. The most straightforward explanation is the more-individuals hypothesis (MIH). It states that higher energy availability promotes a higher total number of individuals in a community, which consequently increases species richness by allowing for a greater number of species with viable populations. Empirical support for the MIH is mixed, partially due to the lack of proper formalisation of the MIH and consequent confusion as to its exact predictions. Here, we review the evidence of the MIH and evaluate the reliability of various predictions that have been tested. There is only limited evidence that spatial variation in species richness is driven by variation in the total number of individuals. There are also problems with measures of energy availability, with scale-dependence, and with the direction of causality, as the total number of individuals may sometimes itself be driven by the number of species. However, even in such a case the total number of individuals may be involved in diversity regulation. We propose a formal theory that encompasses these processes, clarifying how the different factors affecting diversity dynamics can be disentangled.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10618 - Ecology
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/GA16-26369S" target="_blank" >GA16-26369S: Je biologická diverzita omezená? Cesta k rovnovážné teorii biodiverzity</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2018
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Ecology Letters
ISSN
1461-023X
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
21
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
6
Stát vydavatele periodika
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
Počet stran výsledku
18
Strana od-do
920-937
Kód UT WoS článku
000431987100015
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—