Biodiversity assessments: origin matters

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11310%2F18%3A10409729" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11310/18:10409729 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=swbkljdwvi" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=swbkljdwvi</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2006686" target="_blank" >10.1371/journal.pbio.2006686</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Biodiversity assessments: origin matters

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Recent global efforts in biodiversity accounting, such as those undertaken through the Con- vention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Bio- diversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), are vital if we are to track conservation progress, ensure that we can address the challenges of global change, and develop powerful and scientifi- cally sound indicators. Schlaepfer [1] proposes that we should work toward inventories of biodiversity that account for native and non-native species regardless of species origin and ecological context. We strongly disagree with the approach of combining counts of native and non-native species because this will reduce our capacity to detect the effects of non-native spe- cies on native biodiversity with potentially devastating consequences. Compelling and abun- dant evidence demonstrates that some non-native species can become invasive and produce major ecosystem disruptions and even native species extinction.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Biodiversity assessments: origin matters

Popis výsledku anglicky

Recent global efforts in biodiversity accounting, such as those undertaken through the Con- vention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Bio- diversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), are vital if we are to track conservation progress, ensure that we can address the challenges of global change, and develop powerful and scientifi- cally sound indicators. Schlaepfer [1] proposes that we should work toward inventories of biodiversity that account for native and non-native species regardless of species origin and ecological context. We strongly disagree with the approach of combining counts of native and non-native species because this will reduce our capacity to detect the effects of non-native spe- cies on native biodiversity with potentially devastating consequences. Compelling and abun- dant evidence demonstrates that some non-native species can become invasive and produce major ecosystem disruptions and even native species extinction.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10618 - Ecology

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2018

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

PLoS Biology

ISSN

1544-9173

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

16

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

11

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

4

Strana od-do

1-4

Kód UT WoS článku

000452442600011

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85056529015