Consequences of capital drain among EU member states
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11310%2F23%3A10472365" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11310/23:10472365 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=A2lqssQffr" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=A2lqssQffr</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.14712/23361980.2023.17" target="_blank" >10.14712/23361980.2023.17</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Consequences of capital drain among EU member states
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The aim of this article is to analyze the capital drain among individual European Union (EU) member states and its cohesive and political consequences. Since the capital drain has not yet been calculated at the individual country level, the methodological part of this article delves into this calculation in more detail. Between 1999 and 2018, Ireland and Luxembourg had the highest capital drain due to their tax haven policies. Apart from these extremes, Czechia experienced the largest capital drain during this period. Inequalities among EU member states were gradually decreasing in terms of gross domestic product and gross national disposable income, suggesting that the EU's cohesion policy has partially been successful in reducing inequalities among EU countries. However, capital drain and its populist interpretations may become a significant political problem for the most negatively affected countries.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Consequences of capital drain among EU member states
Popis výsledku anglicky
The aim of this article is to analyze the capital drain among individual European Union (EU) member states and its cohesive and political consequences. Since the capital drain has not yet been calculated at the individual country level, the methodological part of this article delves into this calculation in more detail. Between 1999 and 2018, Ireland and Luxembourg had the highest capital drain due to their tax haven policies. Apart from these extremes, Czechia experienced the largest capital drain during this period. Inequalities among EU member states were gradually decreasing in terms of gross domestic product and gross national disposable income, suggesting that the EU's cohesion policy has partially been successful in reducing inequalities among EU countries. However, capital drain and its populist interpretations may become a significant political problem for the most negatively affected countries.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50701 - Cultural and economic geography
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/TL02000195" target="_blank" >TL02000195: Aplikace poznatků současného výzkumu politické geografie ve výuce geografie a sociálně-vědních předmětů na středních školách</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2023
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Acta Universitatis Carolinae. Geographica
ISSN
0300-5402
e-ISSN
2336-1980
Svazek periodika
58
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
2
Stát vydavatele periodika
CZ - Česká republika
Počet stran výsledku
13
Strana od-do
225-237
Kód UT WoS článku
001127598400008
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85182353118