Political Polarisation on Gender Equality: The Case of the Swiss Women’s Strike on Twitter
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11320%2F22%3ABKW7VUF2" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11320/22:BKW7VUF2 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/spp-2022-0003/html" target="_blank" >https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/spp-2022-0003/html</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/spp-2022-0003" target="_blank" >10.1515/spp-2022-0003</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Political Polarisation on Gender Equality: The Case of the Swiss Women’s Strike on Twitter
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Social media platforms constitute an indispensable tool for social movements to mobilise public opinion to promote social change. To date, however, little is known about the extent to which activist and political claims formulated on social media echo what the general public thinks about gender equality. This is especially important given that social movements often use social media to develop their actions and to build long-standing support around particular claims. Our data collection is based on relevant actor groups and keywords surrounding the women’s strike that took place in Switzerland in June 2019. We investigate which actor groups were involved in gender equality discussions online, what were the prominent and polarising ideologies, and what were the main framings of the debate. Findings indicate that organizational committees and their followers were the most active, followed by political actors. We also observed a polarisation effect on social media between left and right-wing oriented actors, which is more pronounced than trends drawn from opinion surveys. We further find that social media discussions were organised along a continuum, which ranges between calling for attention and discussing concrete policy measures.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Political Polarisation on Gender Equality: The Case of the Swiss Women’s Strike on Twitter
Popis výsledku anglicky
Social media platforms constitute an indispensable tool for social movements to mobilise public opinion to promote social change. To date, however, little is known about the extent to which activist and political claims formulated on social media echo what the general public thinks about gender equality. This is especially important given that social movements often use social media to develop their actions and to build long-standing support around particular claims. Our data collection is based on relevant actor groups and keywords surrounding the women’s strike that took place in Switzerland in June 2019. We investigate which actor groups were involved in gender equality discussions online, what were the prominent and polarising ideologies, and what were the main framings of the debate. Findings indicate that organizational committees and their followers were the most active, followed by political actors. We also observed a polarisation effect on social media between left and right-wing oriented actors, which is more pronounced than trends drawn from opinion surveys. We further find that social media discussions were organised along a continuum, which ranges between calling for attention and discussing concrete policy measures.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>SC</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
—
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2022
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Statistics, Politics, and Policy [online]
ISSN
2151-7509
e-ISSN
2151-7509
Svazek periodika
13
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
3
Stát vydavatele periodika
DE - Spolková republika Německo
Počet stran výsledku
24
Strana od-do
255-278
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85137902659