Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Political Polarisation on Gender Equality: The Case of the Swiss Women’s Strike on Twitter

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11320%2F22%3ABKW7VUF2" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11320/22:BKW7VUF2 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/spp-2022-0003/html" target="_blank" >https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/spp-2022-0003/html</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/spp-2022-0003" target="_blank" >10.1515/spp-2022-0003</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Political Polarisation on Gender Equality: The Case of the Swiss Women’s Strike on Twitter

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    Social media platforms constitute an indispensable tool for social movements to mobilise public opinion to promote social change. To date, however, little is known about the extent to which activist and political claims formulated on social media echo what the general public thinks about gender equality. This is especially important given that social movements often use social media to develop their actions and to build long-standing support around particular claims. Our data collection is based on relevant actor groups and keywords surrounding the women’s strike that took place in Switzerland in June 2019. We investigate which actor groups were involved in gender equality discussions online, what were the prominent and polarising ideologies, and what were the main framings of the debate. Findings indicate that organizational committees and their followers were the most active, followed by political actors. We also observed a polarisation effect on social media between left and right-wing oriented actors, which is more pronounced than trends drawn from opinion surveys. We further find that social media discussions were organised along a continuum, which ranges between calling for attention and discussing concrete policy measures.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Political Polarisation on Gender Equality: The Case of the Swiss Women’s Strike on Twitter

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    Social media platforms constitute an indispensable tool for social movements to mobilise public opinion to promote social change. To date, however, little is known about the extent to which activist and political claims formulated on social media echo what the general public thinks about gender equality. This is especially important given that social movements often use social media to develop their actions and to build long-standing support around particular claims. Our data collection is based on relevant actor groups and keywords surrounding the women’s strike that took place in Switzerland in June 2019. We investigate which actor groups were involved in gender equality discussions online, what were the prominent and polarising ideologies, and what were the main framings of the debate. Findings indicate that organizational committees and their followers were the most active, followed by political actors. We also observed a polarisation effect on social media between left and right-wing oriented actors, which is more pronounced than trends drawn from opinion surveys. We further find that social media discussions were organised along a continuum, which ranges between calling for attention and discussing concrete policy measures.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>SC</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2022

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Statistics, Politics, and Policy [online]

  • ISSN

    2151-7509

  • e-ISSN

    2151-7509

  • Svazek periodika

    13

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    3

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    DE - Spolková republika Německo

  • Počet stran výsledku

    24

  • Strana od-do

    255-278

  • Kód UT WoS článku

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-85137902659