Martian bow shock and magnetic pileup boundary models based on machine learning

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11320%2F24%3A10484600" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11320/24:10484600 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=5tHQJVvKhd" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=5tHQJVvKhd</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2024.03.030" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.asr.2024.03.030</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Martian bow shock and magnetic pileup boundary models based on machine learning

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Traditional Martian bow shock and magnetic pileup (magnetopause) boundary models are based on the fitting of free parameters in a prescribed formula. The form of the formula, fitted data, and considered controlling parameters distinguish the individual models from each other. However, all these models have one thing in common: the shape of the boundary and the parametric dependence assumed are fixed by the prescribed formula. The fitted data set typically consists of individual identified boundary crossings. This approach can suffer from a significant bias, as the boundary crossings are more likely to be identified in regions where a spacecraft spends more time. In this study, we use an automated region classification of the data measured by the Mars Atmosphere and Volatile EvolutioN (MAVEN) spacecraft to solar wind, magnetosheath, or magnetosphere. This is achieved by applying the Support Vector Machine method to individual spacecraft half-orbits (from periapsis to apoapsis or vice versa). Two different models of the locations of the bow shock and magnetic pileup boundaries are then constructed based on neural networks: i) a model trained using the classified data, and ii) a model trained using individual identified boundary crossings. As compared to formal empirical modeling efforts, the neural network models do not assume any prescribed shape/distance formula. Optimal model parameterization (considering the solar wind dynamic pressure, solar ionizing flux, crustal magnetic field magnitude, Alfve&lt;acute accent&gt;n Mach number, and interplanetary magnetic field magnitude) is discussed and the model performance evaluated. (c) 2024 COSPAR. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Martian bow shock and magnetic pileup boundary models based on machine learning

Popis výsledku anglicky

Traditional Martian bow shock and magnetic pileup (magnetopause) boundary models are based on the fitting of free parameters in a prescribed formula. The form of the formula, fitted data, and considered controlling parameters distinguish the individual models from each other. However, all these models have one thing in common: the shape of the boundary and the parametric dependence assumed are fixed by the prescribed formula. The fitted data set typically consists of individual identified boundary crossings. This approach can suffer from a significant bias, as the boundary crossings are more likely to be identified in regions where a spacecraft spends more time. In this study, we use an automated region classification of the data measured by the Mars Atmosphere and Volatile EvolutioN (MAVEN) spacecraft to solar wind, magnetosheath, or magnetosphere. This is achieved by applying the Support Vector Machine method to individual spacecraft half-orbits (from periapsis to apoapsis or vice versa). Two different models of the locations of the bow shock and magnetic pileup boundaries are then constructed based on neural networks: i) a model trained using the classified data, and ii) a model trained using individual identified boundary crossings. As compared to formal empirical modeling efforts, the neural network models do not assume any prescribed shape/distance formula. Optimal model parameterization (considering the solar wind dynamic pressure, solar ionizing flux, crustal magnetic field magnitude, Alfve&lt;acute accent&gt;n Mach number, and interplanetary magnetic field magnitude) is discussed and the model performance evaluated. (c) 2024 COSPAR. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10305 - Fluids and plasma physics (including surface physics)

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/LUAUS23152" target="_blank" >LUAUS23152: Elektrodynamika magnetosfér a ionosfér Země, Jupiteru a Marsu</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach<br>I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2024

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Advances in Space Research

ISSN

0273-1177

e-ISSN

1879-1948

Svazek periodika

73

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

12

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

12

Strana od-do

6298-6309

Kód UT WoS článku

001238205700001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85188747642