Notational Variants and Cognition: The Case of Dependency Grammar

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11320%2F25%3A57VQGFGR" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11320/25:57VQGFGR - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00216208:11320/23:ZBX38FY9

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85145845155&doi=10.1007%2fs10670-022-00657-0&partnerID=40&md5=50f3579384c875c62c1bf163d4c488d9" target="_blank" >https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85145845155&doi=10.1007%2fs10670-022-00657-0&partnerID=40&md5=50f3579384c875c62c1bf163d4c488d9</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10670-022-00657-0" target="_blank" >10.1007/s10670-022-00657-0</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Notational Variants and Cognition: The Case of Dependency Grammar

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

In recent years, dependency grammars have established themselves as valuable tools in theoretical and computational linguistics. To many linguists, dependency grammars and the more standard constituency-based formalisms are notational variants. We argue that, beyond considerations of formal equivalence, cognition may also serve as a background for a genuine comparison between these different views of syntax. In this paper, we review and evaluate some of the most common arguments and evidence employed to advocate for the cognitive or neural reality of dependency grammars in linguistics, psycholinguistics, or neurolinguistics. We then raise the possibility that the abilities to represent and track, alternatively or in parallel, constituency and dependency structures co-exist in human cognition and are constitutive of syntactic competence. © The Author(s) 2023.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Notational Variants and Cognition: The Case of Dependency Grammar

Popis výsledku anglicky

In recent years, dependency grammars have established themselves as valuable tools in theoretical and computational linguistics. To many linguists, dependency grammars and the more standard constituency-based formalisms are notational variants. We argue that, beyond considerations of formal equivalence, cognition may also serve as a background for a genuine comparison between these different views of syntax. In this paper, we review and evaluate some of the most common arguments and evidence employed to advocate for the cognitive or neural reality of dependency grammars in linguistics, psycholinguistics, or neurolinguistics. We then raise the possibility that the abilities to represent and track, alternatively or in parallel, constituency and dependency structures co-exist in human cognition and are constitutive of syntactic competence. © The Author(s) 2023.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

—

Rok uplatnění

2024

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Erkenntnis

ISSN

0165-0106

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

89

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

7

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

31

Strana od-do

2867-2897

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85145845155