The general meaning as a potential

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11320%2F25%3AAUT8CTZ2" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11320/25:AUT8CTZ2 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00216208:11210/23:10468428

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85171683898&doi=10.1080%2f03740463.2023.2234234&partnerID=40&md5=0e7cf339e1d7bd3e2cbe1920849993ff" target="_blank" >https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85171683898&doi=10.1080%2f03740463.2023.2234234&partnerID=40&md5=0e7cf339e1d7bd3e2cbe1920849993ff</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03740463.2023.2234234" target="_blank" >10.1080/03740463.2023.2234234</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The general meaning as a potential

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This article examines the idea of the “potentiality” of language phenomena as expressed by Vilém Mathesius in 1911, and its relation to the debate on the general or basic concept of a linguistic category, discussed by Roman Jakobson, Louis Hjelmslev and others around 1935. We track the concept of potentiality in Roman Jakobson’s and Louis Hjelmslev’s texts from the period, then we point out similarities with ideas expressed by Émile Benveniste around the same time. Next, we examine Mathesius’ very different idea of potentiality as the state of linguistic expressions that may be otherwise. However, by tracking the problem through Mathesius’ later texts, I follow how his theorization gradually develops to converge with Jakobson’s. I will stress the importance for Mathesius as a professor of English philology of the problem of the sentence, with a focus on the Focus-Topic articulation theory in the whole process. © 2023 The Linguistic Circle of Copenhagen.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The general meaning as a potential

Popis výsledku anglicky

This article examines the idea of the “potentiality” of language phenomena as expressed by Vilém Mathesius in 1911, and its relation to the debate on the general or basic concept of a linguistic category, discussed by Roman Jakobson, Louis Hjelmslev and others around 1935. We track the concept of potentiality in Roman Jakobson’s and Louis Hjelmslev’s texts from the period, then we point out similarities with ideas expressed by Émile Benveniste around the same time. Next, we examine Mathesius’ very different idea of potentiality as the state of linguistic expressions that may be otherwise. However, by tracking the problem through Mathesius’ later texts, I follow how his theorization gradually develops to converge with Jakobson’s. I will stress the importance for Mathesius as a professor of English philology of the problem of the sentence, with a focus on the Focus-Topic articulation theory in the whole process. © 2023 The Linguistic Circle of Copenhagen.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

—

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Acta Linguistica Hafniensia

ISSN

03740463

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

55

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

18

Strana od-do

37 - 54

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85171683898