Polarity reversal constructions and counterfactuals in Ancient Greek: Between implicature and conventionalization
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11320%2F25%3ATF94TBTE" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11320/25:TF94TBTE - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85187689585&doi=10.1075%2fjhl.22048.lar&partnerID=40&md5=0b0ce233163fce715f7a2d0a3a11e92c" target="_blank" >https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85187689585&doi=10.1075%2fjhl.22048.lar&partnerID=40&md5=0b0ce233163fce715f7a2d0a3a11e92c</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/jhl.22048.lar" target="_blank" >10.1075/jhl.22048.lar</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Polarity reversal constructions and counterfactuals in Ancient Greek: Between implicature and conventionalization
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Polarity reversal has recently been argued to be the defining characteristic of counterfactuality. Ancient Greek had a diverse set of constructions which bring about polarity reversal that is not the direct result of a negation marker nor do they all express a counterfactual meaning. It is the aim of this paper to detail the major differences between these constructions synchronically and especially diachronically, focusing on counterfactual mood forms, counterfactual modal verbs, avertives (almost+past (im)perfective), non-counterfactual rhetorical questions and non-standard wishes. As a historically varied constructional group, these constructions bring about polarity reversal in different ways with different implicatures (e.g., counterfactual, contradictory, undesirable), but they most importantly differ in their diachronic conventionalization of polarity reversal. Whereas counterfactuals conventionalize their polarity reversal in various ways (e.g., changing temporal reference, counterfactual implicature transfer), non-counterfactual polarity reversal constructions create polarity reversal as a synchronic implicature through pragmatic means (e.g., a rhetorical question identifying a contradictory presupposition in the common ground or a non-standard wish evaluating an undesirable outcome to the speaker). © John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Polarity reversal constructions and counterfactuals in Ancient Greek: Between implicature and conventionalization
Popis výsledku anglicky
Polarity reversal has recently been argued to be the defining characteristic of counterfactuality. Ancient Greek had a diverse set of constructions which bring about polarity reversal that is not the direct result of a negation marker nor do they all express a counterfactual meaning. It is the aim of this paper to detail the major differences between these constructions synchronically and especially diachronically, focusing on counterfactual mood forms, counterfactual modal verbs, avertives (almost+past (im)perfective), non-counterfactual rhetorical questions and non-standard wishes. As a historically varied constructional group, these constructions bring about polarity reversal in different ways with different implicatures (e.g., counterfactual, contradictory, undesirable), but they most importantly differ in their diachronic conventionalization of polarity reversal. Whereas counterfactuals conventionalize their polarity reversal in various ways (e.g., changing temporal reference, counterfactual implicature transfer), non-counterfactual polarity reversal constructions create polarity reversal as a synchronic implicature through pragmatic means (e.g., a rhetorical question identifying a contradictory presupposition in the common ground or a non-standard wish evaluating an undesirable outcome to the speaker). © John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>SC</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
—
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2024
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Journal of Historical Linguistics
ISSN
22102116
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
14
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
2
Stát vydavatele periodika
US - Spojené státy americké
Počet stran výsledku
41
Strana od-do
335 - 375
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85187689585