Between Two Emancipations: Louise Erdrich and the Politics of Disavowal

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11320%2F26%3A4P7XF3AS" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11320/26:4P7XF3AS - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-105012429399&doi=10.1093%2Fmelus%2Fmlaf010&partnerID=40&md5=9a3a594b9c86243b427e7242394046f5" target="_blank" >https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-105012429399&doi=10.1093%2Fmelus%2Fmlaf010&partnerID=40&md5=9a3a594b9c86243b427e7242394046f5</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/melus/mlaf010" target="_blank" >10.1093/melus/mlaf010</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Between Two Emancipations: Louise Erdrich and the Politics of Disavowal

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Louise Erdrich's The Night Watchman (2020) recounts a fictionalized history of the Turtle Mountain Reservation's fight against the US government's attempt in the early 1950s to ""emancipate"" the tribe by terminating its tribal status. I begin my discussion, however, with the debate about the politics of Erdrich's aesthetics inaugurated by Leslie Marmon Silko's critique of The Beet Queen (1986). Because of its explicitly political context, The Night Watchman offers an ideal occasion to revisit these questions about the relation between politics and aesthetics in Erdrich's fiction. Drawing on American studies and Indigenous studies, I show that the novel foregrounds disavowal as the dominant structure by which the US settler state works simultaneously to acknowledge and deny Indigenous rights and sovereignty, a structure exemplified by the policies of the termination era (1940s-60s). Erdrich's novel challenges anti-Indigenous violence by staging different possibilities of emancipation. While the central narrative privileges a politics of recognition, in which the settler state continues to recognize the sovereign status of the Turtle Mountain Reservation, the novel represents other forms of political engagement. One occurs through a brief allusion to Lolita Lebron and Puerto Rican nationalism and their strategy of revolutionary counterviolence. The novel becomes further complicated, however, in its persistent yet elliptical allusions to Blackness and Black history. I conclude the article with a series of open provocations that question the limits of Erdrich's political aesthetic in terms of its capacity to imagine forms of solidarity across racial and ethnic differences. © 2025 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Between Two Emancipations: Louise Erdrich and the Politics of Disavowal

Popis výsledku anglicky

Louise Erdrich's The Night Watchman (2020) recounts a fictionalized history of the Turtle Mountain Reservation's fight against the US government's attempt in the early 1950s to ""emancipate"" the tribe by terminating its tribal status. I begin my discussion, however, with the debate about the politics of Erdrich's aesthetics inaugurated by Leslie Marmon Silko's critique of The Beet Queen (1986). Because of its explicitly political context, The Night Watchman offers an ideal occasion to revisit these questions about the relation between politics and aesthetics in Erdrich's fiction. Drawing on American studies and Indigenous studies, I show that the novel foregrounds disavowal as the dominant structure by which the US settler state works simultaneously to acknowledge and deny Indigenous rights and sovereignty, a structure exemplified by the policies of the termination era (1940s-60s). Erdrich's novel challenges anti-Indigenous violence by staging different possibilities of emancipation. While the central narrative privileges a politics of recognition, in which the settler state continues to recognize the sovereign status of the Turtle Mountain Reservation, the novel represents other forms of political engagement. One occurs through a brief allusion to Lolita Lebron and Puerto Rican nationalism and their strategy of revolutionary counterviolence. The novel becomes further complicated, however, in its persistent yet elliptical allusions to Blackness and Black history. I conclude the article with a series of open provocations that question the limits of Erdrich's political aesthetic in terms of its capacity to imagine forms of solidarity across racial and ethnic differences. © 2025 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

—

Rok uplatnění

2025

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

MELUS

ISSN

19463170

e-ISSN

0163755X

Svazek periodika

50

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

24

Strana od-do

141 - 164

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-105012429399