Strengths and Weaknesses of LLM-Based and Rule-Based NLP Technologies and Their Potential Synergies †
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11320%2F26%3ALP7WTV8U" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11320/26:LP7WTV8U - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/electronics14153064" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/electronics14153064</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/electronics14153064" target="_blank" >10.3390/electronics14153064</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Strengths and Weaknesses of LLM-Based and Rule-Based NLP Technologies and Their Potential Synergies †
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Large Language Models (LLMs) have been the cutting-edge technology in natural language processing (NLP) in recent years, making machine-generated text indistinguishable from human-generated text. On the other hand, “rule-based” Natural Language Generation (NLG) and Natural Language Understanding (NLU) algorithms were developed in earlier years, and they have performed well in certain areas of Natural Language Processing (NLP). Today, an arduous task that arises is how to estimate the quality of the produced text. This process depends on the aspects of text that you need to assess, varying from correct grammar and syntax to more intriguing aspects such as coherence and semantical fluency. Although the performance of LLMs is high, the challenge is whether LLMs can cooperate with rule-based NLG/NLU technology by leveraging their assets to overcome LLMs’ weak points. This paper presents the basics of these two families of technologies and the applications, strengths, and weaknesses of each approach, analyzes the different ways of evaluating a machine-generated text, and, lastly, focuses on a first-level approach of possible combinations of these two approaches to enhance performance in specific tasks. © 2025 by the authors.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Strengths and Weaknesses of LLM-Based and Rule-Based NLP Technologies and Their Potential Synergies †
Popis výsledku anglicky
Large Language Models (LLMs) have been the cutting-edge technology in natural language processing (NLP) in recent years, making machine-generated text indistinguishable from human-generated text. On the other hand, “rule-based” Natural Language Generation (NLG) and Natural Language Understanding (NLU) algorithms were developed in earlier years, and they have performed well in certain areas of Natural Language Processing (NLP). Today, an arduous task that arises is how to estimate the quality of the produced text. This process depends on the aspects of text that you need to assess, varying from correct grammar and syntax to more intriguing aspects such as coherence and semantical fluency. Although the performance of LLMs is high, the challenge is whether LLMs can cooperate with rule-based NLG/NLU technology by leveraging their assets to overcome LLMs’ weak points. This paper presents the basics of these two families of technologies and the applications, strengths, and weaknesses of each approach, analyzes the different ways of evaluating a machine-generated text, and, lastly, focuses on a first-level approach of possible combinations of these two approaches to enhance performance in specific tasks. © 2025 by the authors.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>SC</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
—
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2025
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Electronics (Switzerland)
ISSN
2079-9292
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
14
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
15
Stát vydavatele periodika
US - Spojené státy americké
Počet stran výsledku
13
Strana od-do
3064
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-105013293693