Rhetorics and Justifications Behind the Transfer of Dual Vocational Education and Training Policy: Insights From the Spanish Case

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11320%2F26%3AQTQM9EUX" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11320/26:QTQM9EUX - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-105008683564&doi=10.1111%2Fijtd.70002&partnerID=40&md5=bee0cd8fb74699471c21ef5a45a9db4b" target="_blank" >https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-105008683564&doi=10.1111%2Fijtd.70002&partnerID=40&md5=bee0cd8fb74699471c21ef5a45a9db4b</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijtd.70002" target="_blank" >10.1111/ijtd.70002</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Rhetorics and Justifications Behind the Transfer of Dual Vocational Education and Training Policy: Insights From the Spanish Case

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

In 2012, in a context of high youth unemployment and under the influence of the European Union, Spain, began adopting dual vocational education and training (VET), initiating a policy transfer process that culminated in 2022 with legislation establishing duality as a defining feature of the national VET system. This article analyses the discourses and justifications expressed by national actors, focusing on the expected benefits that supported the adoption of dual VET during this phase. This study employs a qualitative methodology combining document analysis and semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed using Reflexive Thematic Analysis to ensure a structured and rigorous approach. The research focuses on governmental, business, union, and educational actors, as well as foundations promoting dual VET, with data collected at the national level and in the autonomous communities of Andalusia and the Basque Country. The analysis identifies four main justifications for the adoption of dual VET in Spain, with the first two being the most widespread: (A) as a solution to the mismatch between qualifications and labour market demands, focusing on employers; (B) as a tool to improve youth employment and reduce unemployment, focusing on young people; (C) as a catalyst for training partnerships and systemic improvement; and (D) as a tool to reduce dropout rates. The two most widespread justifications (A and B) reflect international trends and the educationalisation of economic problems. Although actors cited Central European models, critics questioned their relevance, pointing to earlier national reforms, regional labour disparities, and stronger VET outcomes than university education. Justification C presented dual VET as a tool to foster collaboration and address underinvestment in public training infrastructure. Justification D, the least prominent, associated dual VET with reducing early school leaving, an idea supported by employers and foundations but not by unions. © 2025 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Rhetorics and Justifications Behind the Transfer of Dual Vocational Education and Training Policy: Insights From the Spanish Case

Popis výsledku anglicky

In 2012, in a context of high youth unemployment and under the influence of the European Union, Spain, began adopting dual vocational education and training (VET), initiating a policy transfer process that culminated in 2022 with legislation establishing duality as a defining feature of the national VET system. This article analyses the discourses and justifications expressed by national actors, focusing on the expected benefits that supported the adoption of dual VET during this phase. This study employs a qualitative methodology combining document analysis and semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed using Reflexive Thematic Analysis to ensure a structured and rigorous approach. The research focuses on governmental, business, union, and educational actors, as well as foundations promoting dual VET, with data collected at the national level and in the autonomous communities of Andalusia and the Basque Country. The analysis identifies four main justifications for the adoption of dual VET in Spain, with the first two being the most widespread: (A) as a solution to the mismatch between qualifications and labour market demands, focusing on employers; (B) as a tool to improve youth employment and reduce unemployment, focusing on young people; (C) as a catalyst for training partnerships and systemic improvement; and (D) as a tool to reduce dropout rates. The two most widespread justifications (A and B) reflect international trends and the educationalisation of economic problems. Although actors cited Central European models, critics questioned their relevance, pointing to earlier national reforms, regional labour disparities, and stronger VET outcomes than university education. Justification C presented dual VET as a tool to foster collaboration and address underinvestment in public training infrastructure. Justification D, the least prominent, associated dual VET with reducing early school leaving, an idea supported by employers and foundations but not by unions. © 2025 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

—

Rok uplatnění

2025

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

International Journal of Training and Development

ISSN

13603736

e-ISSN

14682419

Svazek periodika

2025

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2025

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

14

Strana od-do

1-14

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-105008683564