Body mass reconstruction on the basis of selected skeletal traits

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11410%2F12%3A10130303" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11410/12:10130303 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://www.schweizerbart.de/papers/anthranz/detail/69/78229/Body_mass_reconstruction_on_the_basis_of_selected_" target="_blank" >http://www.schweizerbart.de/papers/anthranz/detail/69/78229/Body_mass_reconstruction_on_the_basis_of_selected_</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1127/0003-5548/2012/0179" target="_blank" >10.1127/0003-5548/2012/0179</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Body mass reconstruction on the basis of selected skeletal traits

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Estimatation of body mass of skeletons with mechanical method (femoral head body mass estimation - FH) and non-mechanical method (stature/living bi-iliac breadth body mass estimation - ST/LBIB) and comparison of reliability and potential use of results obtained with both methods is presented. The material (46 skeletons, 26 males, 20 females) came from Cedynia, Poland. Body mass reconstruction according to non-mechanical method was made using equations proposed by Ruff et al. (2005). Body mass estimationbased on the mechanical method was calculated using formulas proposed by Ruff et al. (1995). In the mechanical body mass reconstruction method, femoral superoinferior breadth was used. econstruction of body weight using the non-mechanical method was based on maximum pelvic breadth and reconstructed body height. The correlation between bi-iliac breadth and femoral head measurements and the correlation between femoral head and reconstructed body height were also calculated. The significan

Název v anglickém jazyce

Body mass reconstruction on the basis of selected skeletal traits

Popis výsledku anglicky

Estimatation of body mass of skeletons with mechanical method (femoral head body mass estimation - FH) and non-mechanical method (stature/living bi-iliac breadth body mass estimation - ST/LBIB) and comparison of reliability and potential use of results obtained with both methods is presented. The material (46 skeletons, 26 males, 20 females) came from Cedynia, Poland. Body mass reconstruction according to non-mechanical method was made using equations proposed by Ruff et al. (2005). Body mass estimationbased on the mechanical method was calculated using formulas proposed by Ruff et al. (1995). In the mechanical body mass reconstruction method, femoral superoinferior breadth was used. econstruction of body weight using the non-mechanical method was based on maximum pelvic breadth and reconstructed body height. The correlation between bi-iliac breadth and femoral head measurements and the correlation between femoral head and reconstructed body height were also calculated. The significan

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AC - Archeologie, antropologie, etnologie

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2012

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Anthropologischer Anzeiger

ISSN

0003-5548

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

69

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

DE - Spolková republika Německo

Počet stran výsledku

11

Strana od-do

305-315

Kód UT WoS článku

000307426500005

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—