Internalization of External Costs of Energy Generation in Central and Eastern European Countries
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11690%2F12%3A10132189" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11690/12:10132189 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1070496512442504" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1070496512442504</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1070496512442504" target="_blank" >10.1177/1070496512442504</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Internalization of External Costs of Energy Generation in Central and Eastern European Countries
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
In this article a bottom-up approach to quantification of air pollution externalities from electricity generation is used to show that market-based instruments are not very effective in internalizing these external costs in six CEE countries. Although governments in CEE countries have regulated air emissions by imposing strict command-and-control measures, most of them have also introduced air emission charges and more recently taxes on electricity. We find however that the level of internalization by these two economic instruments is fairly low for existing fossil-fired power plants ranging from 3% for coal- and lignite-fuelled plants to 31% for gas-fuelled plants. The picture improves if cross-subsidies for renewable electricity are accounted for butthe internalization level is still below air pollution-related external costs, between 9% and 55% for coal- and oil-fired power plants. A substantial overinternalization by these three instruments is however encountered in the case of ga
Název v anglickém jazyce
Internalization of External Costs of Energy Generation in Central and Eastern European Countries
Popis výsledku anglicky
In this article a bottom-up approach to quantification of air pollution externalities from electricity generation is used to show that market-based instruments are not very effective in internalizing these external costs in six CEE countries. Although governments in CEE countries have regulated air emissions by imposing strict command-and-control measures, most of them have also introduced air emission charges and more recently taxes on electricity. We find however that the level of internalization by these two economic instruments is fairly low for existing fossil-fired power plants ranging from 3% for coal- and lignite-fuelled plants to 31% for gas-fuelled plants. The picture improves if cross-subsidies for renewable electricity are accounted for butthe internalization level is still below air pollution-related external costs, between 9% and 55% for coal- and oil-fired power plants. A substantial overinternalization by these three instruments is however encountered in the case of ga
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
AH - Ekonomie
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/SPII4I1%2F52%2F07" target="_blank" >SPII4I1/52/07: Modelování dopadů environmentální daňové reformy: II. etapa EDR</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2012
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Journal of Environment and Development
ISSN
1070-4965
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
21
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
2
Stát vydavatele periodika
US - Spojené státy americké
Počet stran výsledku
17
Strana od-do
181-197
Kód UT WoS článku
000304717200003
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—