Ecological footprint of nations: Comparison of process analysis, and standard and hybrid multiregional input-output analysis

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11690%2F14%3A10289936" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11690/14:10289936 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.02.020" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.02.020</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.02.020" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.02.020</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Ecological footprint of nations: Comparison of process analysis, and standard and hybrid multiregional input-output analysis

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The ecological footprint (EF) is an indicator of human requirements on bio-productive land, an essential but limited resource, which use is related to environmental burden. In this article, we compare three methods for calculating national EF: a) the process analysis represented by Global Footprint Network (GFN) accounts; b) a standard environmentally extended multi-regional input-output model (EE-MRIOM); and c) a hybrid EE-MRIOM. The process analysis accounts for total domestic production and international trade of selected products. A standard EE-MRIOMfurther accounts for the upstreamfootprint of all traded products, but has a lowresolution of relevant products in available datasets. The hybrid EE-MRIOmethod assessed here traces the primary biomass products in physical units through environmental extensions. Our results show that the standard MRIO model might introduce a significant error due to low resolution and poor data quality. The hybrid MRIO approach provides more accurate res

Název v anglickém jazyce

Ecological footprint of nations: Comparison of process analysis, and standard and hybrid multiregional input-output analysis

Popis výsledku anglicky

The ecological footprint (EF) is an indicator of human requirements on bio-productive land, an essential but limited resource, which use is related to environmental burden. In this article, we compare three methods for calculating national EF: a) the process analysis represented by Global Footprint Network (GFN) accounts; b) a standard environmentally extended multi-regional input-output model (EE-MRIOM); and c) a hybrid EE-MRIOM. The process analysis accounts for total domestic production and international trade of selected products. A standard EE-MRIOMfurther accounts for the upstreamfootprint of all traded products, but has a lowresolution of relevant products in available datasets. The hybrid EE-MRIOmethod assessed here traces the primary biomass products in physical units through environmental extensions. Our results show that the standard MRIO model might introduce a significant error due to low resolution and poor data quality. The hybrid MRIO approach provides more accurate res

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AE - Řízení, správa a administrativa

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA14-05292S" target="_blank" >GA14-05292S: Globální přivlastnění primární produkce z pohledu odpovědnosti spotřebitele</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2014

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Ecological Economics

ISSN

0921-8009

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

101

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

may

Stát vydavatele periodika

NL - Nizozemsko

Počet stran výsledku

22

Strana od-do

115-126

Kód UT WoS článku

000336117400011

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—