The relation between the composition of corpora (genre balance and representativeness) and their reliability in compiling general explanatory dictionary

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A90244%2F24%3A10495720" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:90244/24:10495720 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=Reqb~9DOAe" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=Reqb~9DOAe</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3986/16.1.07" target="_blank" >10.3986/16.1.07</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The relation between the composition of corpora (genre balance and representativeness) and their reliability in compiling general explanatory dictionary

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This paper aims to examine the genre composition of certain Slovenian corpora as sources for lexicographic analysis (especially when compiling dictionaries such as eSSKJ, the general explanatory dictionary), particularly of the largest corpus, Gigafida 2.0 (divided into two sub-corpora: a sub-corpus of non-fiction and literary texts and a sub-corpus of journalistic texts), the Corpus of Slovenian School Texts, the Corpus of Scientific Texts of Contemporary Slovenian, as well as the KRES corpus. We argue that corpora with major discrepancy in the proportions between different text genres used as lexicographic resources do not reflect the proportions between meanings which originate in semantic extension processes. Thus, one of the largest corpora available for Slovene, Gigafida (in both versions, 1.0 and 2.0, updated in 2019), could hardly be regarded as a reference source of data for a general explanatory dictionary. This is because various journalistic texts and web texts are predominant in Gigafida, while the share of non-fiction and literary texts does not exceed 10% in total. We suggest that a corpus should be at least approximately balanced, which could in turn provide its representativeness.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The relation between the composition of corpora (genre balance and representativeness) and their reliability in compiling general explanatory dictionary

Popis výsledku anglicky

This paper aims to examine the genre composition of certain Slovenian corpora as sources for lexicographic analysis (especially when compiling dictionaries such as eSSKJ, the general explanatory dictionary), particularly of the largest corpus, Gigafida 2.0 (divided into two sub-corpora: a sub-corpus of non-fiction and literary texts and a sub-corpus of journalistic texts), the Corpus of Slovenian School Texts, the Corpus of Scientific Texts of Contemporary Slovenian, as well as the KRES corpus. We argue that corpora with major discrepancy in the proportions between different text genres used as lexicographic resources do not reflect the proportions between meanings which originate in semantic extension processes. Thus, one of the largest corpora available for Slovene, Gigafida (in both versions, 1.0 and 2.0, updated in 2019), could hardly be regarded as a reference source of data for a general explanatory dictionary. This is because various journalistic texts and web texts are predominant in Gigafida, while the share of non-fiction and literary texts does not exceed 10% in total. We suggest that a corpus should be at least approximately balanced, which could in turn provide its representativeness.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60203 - Linguistics

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

—

Rok uplatnění

2024

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Slovenski jezik - Slovene linguistic studies

ISSN

1408-2616

e-ISSN

1581-1271

Svazek periodika

2024

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

16

Stát vydavatele periodika

SI - Slovinská republika

Počet stran výsledku

28

Strana od-do

149-176

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85213691209