Management of Single Large Nonstaghorn Renal Stones in the CROES PCNL Global Study

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14110%2F12%3A00059904" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14110/12:00059904 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/65269705:_____/12:#0001726

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.11.113" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.11.113</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.11.113" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.juro.2011.11.113</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Management of Single Large Nonstaghorn Renal Stones in the CROES PCNL Global Study

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

We compared stone characteristics and outcomes in patients with a single large nonstaghorn renal calculus treated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the Clinical Research Office of Endourological Society global study. Materials and Methods: Two statistical analyses were done, including one comparing renal stone size (20 to 30, 31 to 40 and 41 to 60 mm) and the other comparing renal stone site (pelvis, or upper, mid or lower calyx). Surgical outcomes, including operative time, hospital stay, stone-freerate and postoperative fever, were compared between groups. Fitness for surgery was assessed using the American Society of Anesthesiologists scoring system. Severity of postoperative complications was graded with the modified Clavien classification. Results: Of 1,448 stones 1,202 (83%) were 20 to 30 mm, 202 (14%) were 31 to 40 mm and 44 (3%) were 41 to 60 mm. Of the large stones 73% were located in the renal pelvis.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Management of Single Large Nonstaghorn Renal Stones in the CROES PCNL Global Study

Popis výsledku anglicky

We compared stone characteristics and outcomes in patients with a single large nonstaghorn renal calculus treated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the Clinical Research Office of Endourological Society global study. Materials and Methods: Two statistical analyses were done, including one comparing renal stone size (20 to 30, 31 to 40 and 41 to 60 mm) and the other comparing renal stone site (pelvis, or upper, mid or lower calyx). Surgical outcomes, including operative time, hospital stay, stone-freerate and postoperative fever, were compared between groups. Fitness for surgery was assessed using the American Society of Anesthesiologists scoring system. Severity of postoperative complications was graded with the modified Clavien classification. Results: Of 1,448 stones 1,202 (83%) were 20 to 30 mm, 202 (14%) were 31 to 40 mm and 44 (3%) were 41 to 60 mm. Of the large stones 73% were located in the renal pelvis.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

FP - Ostatní lékařské obory

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2012

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Journal of Urology

ISSN

0022-5347

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

187

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

4

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

5

Strana od-do

1293-1297

Kód UT WoS článku

000301922300050

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—