Status Update and Interim Results from the Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial-2 (ACST-2)
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14110%2F13%3A00071242" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14110/13:00071242 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/00843989:_____/13:E0103753 RIV/00159816:_____/13:00060679 RIV/61989592:15120/13:33149365
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.07.020" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.07.020</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.07.020" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.07.020</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Status Update and Interim Results from the Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial-2 (ACST-2)
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Objectives: ACST-2 is currently the largest trial ever conducted to compare carotid artery stenting (CAS) with carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in patients with severe asymptomatic carotid stenosis requiring revascularization. Methods: Patients are entered into ACST-2 when revascularization is felt to be clearly indicated, when CEA and CAS are both possible, but where there is substantial uncertainty as to which is most appropriate. Trial surgeons and interventionalists are expected to use their usual techniques and CE-approved devices. We report baseline characteristics and blinded combined interim results for 30-day mortality and major morbidity for 986 patients in the ongoing trial up to September 2012. Results: A total of 986 patients (687 men, 299 women), mean age 68.7 years (SD +/- 8.1) were randomized equally to CEA or CAS. Most (96%) had ipsilateral stenosis of 70-99% (median 80%) with contralateral stenoses of 50-99% in 30% and contralateral occlusion in 8%.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Status Update and Interim Results from the Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial-2 (ACST-2)
Popis výsledku anglicky
Objectives: ACST-2 is currently the largest trial ever conducted to compare carotid artery stenting (CAS) with carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in patients with severe asymptomatic carotid stenosis requiring revascularization. Methods: Patients are entered into ACST-2 when revascularization is felt to be clearly indicated, when CEA and CAS are both possible, but where there is substantial uncertainty as to which is most appropriate. Trial surgeons and interventionalists are expected to use their usual techniques and CE-approved devices. We report baseline characteristics and blinded combined interim results for 30-day mortality and major morbidity for 986 patients in the ongoing trial up to September 2012. Results: A total of 986 patients (687 men, 299 women), mean age 68.7 years (SD +/- 8.1) were randomized equally to CEA or CAS. Most (96%) had ipsilateral stenosis of 70-99% (median 80%) with contralateral stenoses of 50-99% in 30% and contralateral occlusion in 8%.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
FJ - Chirurgie včetně transplantologie
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2013
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY
ISSN
1078-5884
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
46
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
5
Stát vydavatele periodika
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
Počet stran výsledku
9
Strana od-do
510-518
Kód UT WoS článku
000327232500004
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—