Analysis of obstetricians' decision making on CTG recordings

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14110%2F14%3A00077743" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14110/14:00077743 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/68407700:21230/14:00220568 RIV/65269705:_____/14:00061811

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2014.04.010" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2014.04.010</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2014.04.010" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.jbi.2014.04.010</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Analysis of obstetricians' decision making on CTG recordings

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Interpretation of cardiotocogram (CTG) is a difficult task since its evaluation is complicated by a great inter- and intra-individual variability. Previous studies have predominantly analyzed clinicians? agreement on CTG evaluation based on quantitativemeasures (e.g. kappa coefficient) that do not offer any insight into clinical decision making. In this paper we aim to examine the agreement on evaluation in detail and provide data-driven analysis of clinical evaluation. For this study, nine obstetricians provided clinical evaluation of 634 CTG recordings (each ca. 60 min long). We studied the agreement on evaluation and its dependence on the increasing number of clinicians involved in the final decision. We showed that despite of large number of clinicians the agreement on CTG evaluations is difficult to reach. The main reason is inherent inter- and intra-observer variability of CTG evaluation.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Analysis of obstetricians' decision making on CTG recordings

Popis výsledku anglicky

Interpretation of cardiotocogram (CTG) is a difficult task since its evaluation is complicated by a great inter- and intra-individual variability. Previous studies have predominantly analyzed clinicians? agreement on CTG evaluation based on quantitativemeasures (e.g. kappa coefficient) that do not offer any insight into clinical decision making. In this paper we aim to examine the agreement on evaluation in detail and provide data-driven analysis of clinical evaluation. For this study, nine obstetricians provided clinical evaluation of 634 CTG recordings (each ca. 60 min long). We studied the agreement on evaluation and its dependence on the increasing number of clinicians involved in the final decision. We showed that despite of large number of clinicians the agreement on CTG evaluations is difficult to reach. The main reason is inherent inter- and intra-observer variability of CTG evaluation.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

FK - Gynekologie a porodnictví

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/NT11124" target="_blank" >NT11124: Vliv hodnocení kardiotokografie pomocí metod umělé inteligence na kvalitu perinatální péče</a><br>

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2014

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Journal of Biomedical Informatics

ISSN

1532-0464

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

51

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

16.4.2014

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

8

Strana od-do

72-79

Kód UT WoS článku

000343362800009

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—