Long-term outcomes in patients after epilepsy surgery failure
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14110%2F15%3A00083356" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14110/15:00083356 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/65269705:_____/15:00063119 RIV/00159816:_____/15:00063119
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2014.11.011" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2014.11.011</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2014.11.011" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2014.11.011</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Long-term outcomes in patients after epilepsy surgery failure
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Purpose: The primary aim of this study was to analyze the long-term outcomes of patients who were classified as Engel IV one year after resective epilepsy surgery. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the effectiveness of different treatment optionsand to examine the reasons that the patients did not undergo resective reoperation. Methods: Our study was designed as a retrospective open-label investigation of the long-term outcomes of 34 patients (12% of all surgically treated patients) who were classified as Engel IV one year after epilepsy surgery. Results: At the last follow-up visit (average of 7.6 +/- 4.2 years after surgery), 12 of the 34 examined patients (35.3%) were still classified as Engel IV; 22 of the 34 patients (64.7%) were improved(Engel I III). Of the 34 patients, 8 (23.5%) achieved an excellent outcome, classified as Engel I, 3 patients (8.8%) were classified as Engel II, and 11 patients (32.4%) as Engel III.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Long-term outcomes in patients after epilepsy surgery failure
Popis výsledku anglicky
Purpose: The primary aim of this study was to analyze the long-term outcomes of patients who were classified as Engel IV one year after resective epilepsy surgery. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the effectiveness of different treatment optionsand to examine the reasons that the patients did not undergo resective reoperation. Methods: Our study was designed as a retrospective open-label investigation of the long-term outcomes of 34 patients (12% of all surgically treated patients) who were classified as Engel IV one year after epilepsy surgery. Results: At the last follow-up visit (average of 7.6 +/- 4.2 years after surgery), 12 of the 34 examined patients (35.3%) were still classified as Engel IV; 22 of the 34 patients (64.7%) were improved(Engel I III). Of the 34 patients, 8 (23.5%) achieved an excellent outcome, classified as Engel I, 3 patients (8.8%) were classified as Engel II, and 11 patients (32.4%) as Engel III.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
FH - Neurologie, neurochirurgie, neurovědy
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/ED1.1.00%2F02.0068" target="_blank" >ED1.1.00/02.0068: CEITEC - central european institute of technology</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2015
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Epilepsy Research
ISSN
0920-1211
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
110
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
February
Stát vydavatele periodika
NL - Nizozemsko
Počet stran výsledku
7
Strana od-do
71-77
Kód UT WoS článku
000349592800010
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—