Contribution of sVEP visual acuity testing in comparison with subjective visual acuity

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14110%2F15%3A00085194" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14110/15:00085194 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5507/bp.2015.002" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.5507/bp.2015.002</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5507/bp.2015.002" target="_blank" >10.5507/bp.2015.002</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Contribution of sVEP visual acuity testing in comparison with subjective visual acuity

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Aims: Visual acuity determination is an important task in ophthalmology and optometry practices. Visual acuity can be examined objectively or subjectively. The objective examination method, sVEP, allows for quick objective measurements of patient's visual acuity. Previous studies have not demonstrated the repeatability of this objective sVEP method. This study aims to evaluate the sVEP method and compare it to a subjective method. Methods and Results: The sample was divided into two groups. For the first group, visual acuity was measured with sVEP and Snellen methods on only one patient twelve times. In the second group, visual acuity was measured twice with sVEP followed twice with the Snellen method with Landolt's rings and logMAR modification on 32non-pathological patients. Results showed significant differences between average values of visual acuity obtained with both methods (sVEP and Snellen) in both samples (T-test, P &lt; 0.01; Wilcoxon test, P = 0.02 in second group).

Název v anglickém jazyce

Contribution of sVEP visual acuity testing in comparison with subjective visual acuity

Popis výsledku anglicky

Aims: Visual acuity determination is an important task in ophthalmology and optometry practices. Visual acuity can be examined objectively or subjectively. The objective examination method, sVEP, allows for quick objective measurements of patient's visual acuity. Previous studies have not demonstrated the repeatability of this objective sVEP method. This study aims to evaluate the sVEP method and compare it to a subjective method. Methods and Results: The sample was divided into two groups. For the first group, visual acuity was measured with sVEP and Snellen methods on only one patient twelve times. In the second group, visual acuity was measured twice with sVEP followed twice with the Snellen method with Landolt's rings and logMAR modification on 32non-pathological patients. Results showed significant differences between average values of visual acuity obtained with both methods (sVEP and Snellen) in both samples (T-test, P &lt; 0.01; Wilcoxon test, P = 0.02 in second group).

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

FF - ORL, oftalmologie, stomatologie

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2015

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Biomedical Papers

ISSN

1213-8118

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

159

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

4

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

6

Strana od-do

616-621

Kód UT WoS článku

000366566700016

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—