Cardiac resynchronization therapy - A comparison of VV delay optimization by 3D echocardiography using systolic dyssynchrony index and QRS width assessment at 6 months after CRT implantation

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14110%2F18%3A00104186" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14110/18:00104186 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crvasa.2017.11.006" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crvasa.2017.11.006</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crvasa.2017.11.006" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.crvasa.2017.11.006</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Cardiac resynchronization therapy - A comparison of VV delay optimization by 3D echocardiography using systolic dyssynchrony index and QRS width assessment at 6 months after CRT implantation

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the setting of interventricular (VV) delay by 3D echocardiography (3DE) using systolic dyssynchrony index (SDI) versus QRS width measurement in new cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) recipients. We observed the impact on the reduction of left ventricle volumes and increase in volumetric responders (defined as a = 15% reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESv)) at the 6-month follow-up. Methods: We included 63 patients with recently implanted CRT in this open-label, randomized trial. Patients were randomized into two groups. VV delay was set by the QRS width in the group 1 (n 31) to obtain the narrowest QRS complex and by SDI in the group 2 (n 32) to achieve the lowest possible value. We evaluated LVESv, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by 3DE, before CRT implantation and at 6-month follow-up, in all patients. We also obtained clinical parameters and the level of NT-proBNP. Results: The second group showed only a trend toward greater reduction of LVESv (-33 +/- 55 ml vs. -48 +/- 43 ml; P 0.367), increase in LVEF (+ 7.3 +/- 10.9% vs. + 10.2 +/- 9.4%; P 0.210) and greater number of volumetric responders (14 vs. 18; P 0.612) compared with the group 1 at 6-month follow-up. There were also no significant differences in clinical outcomes and the level of NT-proBNP. Conclusion: Individual CRT optimization using SDI compared with QRS duration assessment did not reveal any significant differences in echocardiographic parameters and clinical outcomes at 6-month follow-up. (c) 2017 The Czech Society of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Sp. z o. o. All rights reserved.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Cardiac resynchronization therapy - A comparison of VV delay optimization by 3D echocardiography using systolic dyssynchrony index and QRS width assessment at 6 months after CRT implantation

Popis výsledku anglicky

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the setting of interventricular (VV) delay by 3D echocardiography (3DE) using systolic dyssynchrony index (SDI) versus QRS width measurement in new cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) recipients. We observed the impact on the reduction of left ventricle volumes and increase in volumetric responders (defined as a = 15% reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESv)) at the 6-month follow-up. Methods: We included 63 patients with recently implanted CRT in this open-label, randomized trial. Patients were randomized into two groups. VV delay was set by the QRS width in the group 1 (n 31) to obtain the narrowest QRS complex and by SDI in the group 2 (n 32) to achieve the lowest possible value. We evaluated LVESv, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by 3DE, before CRT implantation and at 6-month follow-up, in all patients. We also obtained clinical parameters and the level of NT-proBNP. Results: The second group showed only a trend toward greater reduction of LVESv (-33 +/- 55 ml vs. -48 +/- 43 ml; P 0.367), increase in LVEF (+ 7.3 +/- 10.9% vs. + 10.2 +/- 9.4%; P 0.210) and greater number of volumetric responders (14 vs. 18; P 0.612) compared with the group 1 at 6-month follow-up. There were also no significant differences in clinical outcomes and the level of NT-proBNP. Conclusion: Individual CRT optimization using SDI compared with QRS duration assessment did not reveal any significant differences in echocardiographic parameters and clinical outcomes at 6-month follow-up. (c) 2017 The Czech Society of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Sp. z o. o. All rights reserved.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30201 - Cardiac and Cardiovascular systems

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2018

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

cor et Vasa

ISSN

0010-8650

e-ISSN

1803-7712

Svazek periodika

60

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

4

Stát vydavatele periodika

NL - Nizozemsko

Počet stran výsledku

10

Strana od-do

„E367“-„E376“

Kód UT WoS článku

000442902500005

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85037999261