Assessing the impact of digital transformation of health services. Report of the EXPH (Expert Panel on effective ways of investing in Health)

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14110%2F19%3A00112933" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14110/19:00112933 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/83d00a4a-2b53-11e9-8d04-01aa75ed71a1/language-en" target="_blank" >https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/83d00a4a-2b53-11e9-8d04-01aa75ed71a1/language-en</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2875/644722" target="_blank" >10.2875/644722</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Assessing the impact of digital transformation of health services. Report of the EXPH (Expert Panel on effective ways of investing in Health)

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The impact of digitalisation of health services has been profound and is expected to be even more profound in the future. Like for other services, it is important to evaluate the impact of such digital health services. Decisions to adopt, use or reimburse new digital health services, at different levels of the health care system, are ideally based on evidence regarding their performance in the light of health system goals. In order to evaluate this, a broad perspective should be taken. Attainment of the broad health system goals, including quality, accessibility, efficiency and equity, are objectives against which to judge new digital health services. These goals are unaltered by the process of digitalisation. Evaluations should be designed and tailored in such a way as to capture all relevant changes in an adequate manner. We do not provide a full evaluation framework in this Opinion, but we do reflect on important elements. Monitoring can also complement evaluations by observing general trends in how health systems evolve, also as a consequence of digitalisation. Many different categorisations of digital health services can be used in the context of their evaluation. We distinguish between interventions for care users, health care providers, for health systems or resource managers, and data services. Moreover, we distinguish between centralised and decentralised decision-making. We advise to start any evaluation with a full description of the relevant digital technology, its use and aims, addressing elements like the ones above to give a full overview of the technology, its intended use, costs and consequences, and its most relevant comparator, in order to be able to select an appropriate evaluation strategy and key parameters to include. Important frameworks and practical guides for the evaluation of digital health services have been proposed. We especially highlight the recent Jasehn and WHO frameworks. These can serve as a starting point both for practical evaluation studies and for further development of evaluation frameworks. In evaluations, the development phase of the digital health service as well as implementation of it, are crucial elements. Combinations of different evaluation types may be required to provide relevant information to decision makers at different moments. Careful selection and justification of applied methods is warranted. Further investment in the development of methodologies and a European repository for evaluation methods and evidence of digital health services is encouraged. When evaluating digital health services many specific aspects need to be considered. We illustrate some of the specificities of evaluating digital health services, including creating a suitable policy context, rules for setting HTA priorities, and using appropriate outcome measures. Governments could play a more active role in the further optimisation both of the process of decision-making (both at the central and decentral level) and the related outcomes. They need to find a balance between centralised and decentralised activity. Moreover, the broader preparation of the health care system to be able to deal with digitalisation, from education, through financial and regulatory preconditions, to implementation of monitoring systems to monitor its effects on health system performance, remains important. We discuss data sources, broader considerations (including cybersecurity, privacy and market power), and provide recommendations for dealing with the digital transformation.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Assessing the impact of digital transformation of health services. Report of the EXPH (Expert Panel on effective ways of investing in Health)

Popis výsledku anglicky

The impact of digitalisation of health services has been profound and is expected to be even more profound in the future. Like for other services, it is important to evaluate the impact of such digital health services. Decisions to adopt, use or reimburse new digital health services, at different levels of the health care system, are ideally based on evidence regarding their performance in the light of health system goals. In order to evaluate this, a broad perspective should be taken. Attainment of the broad health system goals, including quality, accessibility, efficiency and equity, are objectives against which to judge new digital health services. These goals are unaltered by the process of digitalisation. Evaluations should be designed and tailored in such a way as to capture all relevant changes in an adequate manner. We do not provide a full evaluation framework in this Opinion, but we do reflect on important elements. Monitoring can also complement evaluations by observing general trends in how health systems evolve, also as a consequence of digitalisation. Many different categorisations of digital health services can be used in the context of their evaluation. We distinguish between interventions for care users, health care providers, for health systems or resource managers, and data services. Moreover, we distinguish between centralised and decentralised decision-making. We advise to start any evaluation with a full description of the relevant digital technology, its use and aims, addressing elements like the ones above to give a full overview of the technology, its intended use, costs and consequences, and its most relevant comparator, in order to be able to select an appropriate evaluation strategy and key parameters to include. Important frameworks and practical guides for the evaluation of digital health services have been proposed. We especially highlight the recent Jasehn and WHO frameworks. These can serve as a starting point both for practical evaluation studies and for further development of evaluation frameworks. In evaluations, the development phase of the digital health service as well as implementation of it, are crucial elements. Combinations of different evaluation types may be required to provide relevant information to decision makers at different moments. Careful selection and justification of applied methods is warranted. Further investment in the development of methodologies and a European repository for evaluation methods and evidence of digital health services is encouraged. When evaluating digital health services many specific aspects need to be considered. We illustrate some of the specificities of evaluating digital health services, including creating a suitable policy context, rules for setting HTA priorities, and using appropriate outcome measures. Governments could play a more active role in the further optimisation both of the process of decision-making (both at the central and decentral level) and the related outcomes. They need to find a balance between centralised and decentralised activity. Moreover, the broader preparation of the health care system to be able to deal with digitalisation, from education, through financial and regulatory preconditions, to implementation of monitoring systems to monitor its effects on health system performance, remains important. We discuss data sources, broader considerations (including cybersecurity, privacy and market power), and provide recommendations for dealing with the digital transformation.

Druh

B - Odborná kniha

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30304 - Public and environmental health

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

R - Projekt Ramcoveho programu EK

Rok uplatnění

2019

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

ISBN

9789279986857

Počet stran knihy

104

Název nakladatele

Publications Office of the European Union

Místo vydání

Luxembourg

Kód UT WoS knihy

—