Citation rules through the eyes of biomedical journal editors
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14110%2F22%3A00125653" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14110/22:00125653 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/leap.1425" target="_blank" >https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/leap.1425</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/leap.1425" target="_blank" >10.1002/leap.1425</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Citation rules through the eyes of biomedical journal editors
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
This research analysed the citations styles used in 1,100 high-impact biomedical journals and the importance attributed by their editors and other members of the editorial office to individual reference components, the citation format and method. We found 70 (6.5%) use the current American Medical Association or NLM/Vancouver style; 425 (39.2%) use their older versions or a variation; 73 (6.7%) use a standard non-biomedical style; and 432 (39.9%) have their own house style. According to 125 respondents who answered the survey, the most important reference components include the author(s), title and year of publication, while the date of update, date of access and language are among the least important. They prefer the citation-sequence method (65.6%) and the author-date method (24%). A comparison of the responses to the survey and the citation guidelines showed that while two-thirds of the respondents view the DOI and ISBN as important information, only a limited number of their journals' citation guidelines require them. Our results show that publishers, authors of standard styles and editors all agree that references should be uncomplicated and concise. A reduction in the number of various styles used might be attainable but would require an agreement between the publishers and authors of the standard styles, which would incorporate the preferences of journal editors.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Citation rules through the eyes of biomedical journal editors
Popis výsledku anglicky
This research analysed the citations styles used in 1,100 high-impact biomedical journals and the importance attributed by their editors and other members of the editorial office to individual reference components, the citation format and method. We found 70 (6.5%) use the current American Medical Association or NLM/Vancouver style; 425 (39.2%) use their older versions or a variation; 73 (6.7%) use a standard non-biomedical style; and 432 (39.9%) have their own house style. According to 125 respondents who answered the survey, the most important reference components include the author(s), title and year of publication, while the date of update, date of access and language are among the least important. They prefer the citation-sequence method (65.6%) and the author-date method (24%). A comparison of the responses to the survey and the citation guidelines showed that while two-thirds of the respondents view the DOI and ISBN as important information, only a limited number of their journals' citation guidelines require them. Our results show that publishers, authors of standard styles and editors all agree that references should be uncomplicated and concise. A reduction in the number of various styles used might be attainable but would require an agreement between the publishers and authors of the standard styles, which would incorporate the preferences of journal editors.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10200 - Computer and information sciences
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2022
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Learned Publishing
ISSN
0953-1513
e-ISSN
1741-4857
Svazek periodika
35
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
2
Stát vydavatele periodika
US - Spojené státy americké
Počet stran výsledku
13
Strana od-do
105-117
Kód UT WoS článku
000720370400001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85119375586