Evaluation of non-healing wounds

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14110%2F22%3A00128281" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14110/22:00128281 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/60076658:12110/22:43907617

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://kont.zsf.jcu.cz/artkey/knt-202201-0009_hodnoceni-nehojicich-se-ran.php" target="_blank" >https://kont.zsf.jcu.cz/artkey/knt-202201-0009_hodnoceni-nehojicich-se-ran.php</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.32725/kont.2021.040" target="_blank" >10.32725/kont.2021.040</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Evaluation of non-healing wounds

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Introduction: The treatment of patients with non-healing wounds requires a systematic approach, including a complete wound assessment and an accurate description of this assessment. Methods: A cross-sectional retrospective study - content analysis of documentation from various localities of the Czech Republic. Using the cluster analysis method to find out if there are groups that differ in their approach to evaluating the parameters of non-healing wounds. 331 dossiers from 16 inpatient and outpatient care providers and social service providers were analysed. Goals: The goal was to assess how non-healing wounds are evaluated and documented in clinical practice at selected health care and social care providers in the Czech Republic. To verify whether a clinical algorithm for evaluating non-healing wounds is available in clinical practice for selected providers and whether it is used. Results: The resulting data can be divided into three separate clusters. Individual groups can be characterised as cluster 1 - "mixed documentation", which contains 280 content analyses; cluster 2 - "nursing documentation of wound healing consultants", which includes 45 content analyses; cluster 3 - "nursing documentation - pre-printed form", which contains six content analyses. Cluster 2 shows more frequent use of objectification in the evaluation of wound parameters. Conclusions: The research showed that evaluating the parameters of non-healing wounds is very inconsistent. The recommended procedure for assessing the condition of non-healing wounds is not adequately followed and accepted in clinical practice. We have verified that the presence of a wound healing consultant is related to the more frequent use of accurate scales to assess wounds.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Evaluation of non-healing wounds

Popis výsledku anglicky

Introduction: The treatment of patients with non-healing wounds requires a systematic approach, including a complete wound assessment and an accurate description of this assessment. Methods: A cross-sectional retrospective study - content analysis of documentation from various localities of the Czech Republic. Using the cluster analysis method to find out if there are groups that differ in their approach to evaluating the parameters of non-healing wounds. 331 dossiers from 16 inpatient and outpatient care providers and social service providers were analysed. Goals: The goal was to assess how non-healing wounds are evaluated and documented in clinical practice at selected health care and social care providers in the Czech Republic. To verify whether a clinical algorithm for evaluating non-healing wounds is available in clinical practice for selected providers and whether it is used. Results: The resulting data can be divided into three separate clusters. Individual groups can be characterised as cluster 1 - "mixed documentation", which contains 280 content analyses; cluster 2 - "nursing documentation of wound healing consultants", which includes 45 content analyses; cluster 3 - "nursing documentation - pre-printed form", which contains six content analyses. Cluster 2 shows more frequent use of objectification in the evaluation of wound parameters. Conclusions: The research showed that evaluating the parameters of non-healing wounds is very inconsistent. The recommended procedure for assessing the condition of non-healing wounds is not adequately followed and accepted in clinical practice. We have verified that the presence of a wound healing consultant is related to the more frequent use of accurate scales to assess wounds.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30307 - Nursing

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Kontakt : Journal of Nursing and Social Sciences related to Health and Illness

ISSN

1212-4117

e-ISSN

1804-7122

Svazek periodika

24

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

9

Strana od-do

55-63

Kód UT WoS článku

000849269000009

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85127215479