In vivo versus in vitro sperm selection

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14110%2F24%3A00139161" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14110/24:00139161 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.jomh.org/articles/10.22514/jomh.2025.016" target="_blank" >https://www.jomh.org/articles/10.22514/jomh.2025.016</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.22514/jomh.2025.016" target="_blank" >10.22514/jomh.2025.016</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

In vivo versus in vitro sperm selection

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The separation of human spermatozoa is an important step in therapy of human infertility. Given that male fertility is decreasing and, as a result, fertilization techniques based on microinjection of sperm into the cytoplasm are being used more intensively, this question is becoming increasingly relevant. In recent years, microfluidic sperm processing techniques have been increasingly used. These methods are simple and easy to use, however, the question is to what extent they select the correct sperm. They are essentially based mainly on motility and do not reflect other navigational approaches such as chemotaxis, thermotaxis or rheotaxis. This review compares traditional, advances and novel in vitro methods of sperm separation which are commonly used during human infertility therapy in context of in vivo sperm separation in female reproductive system.

Název v anglickém jazyce

In vivo versus in vitro sperm selection

Popis výsledku anglicky

The separation of human spermatozoa is an important step in therapy of human infertility. Given that male fertility is decreasing and, as a result, fertilization techniques based on microinjection of sperm into the cytoplasm are being used more intensively, this question is becoming increasingly relevant. In recent years, microfluidic sperm processing techniques have been increasingly used. These methods are simple and easy to use, however, the question is to what extent they select the correct sperm. They are essentially based mainly on motility and do not reflect other navigational approaches such as chemotaxis, thermotaxis or rheotaxis. This review compares traditional, advances and novel in vitro methods of sperm separation which are commonly used during human infertility therapy in context of in vivo sperm separation in female reproductive system.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30304 - Public and environmental health

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2024

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

JOURNAL OF MENS HEALTH

ISSN

1875-6867

e-ISSN

1875-6859

Svazek periodika

21

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

SG - Singapurská republika

Počet stran výsledku

10

Strana od-do

1-10

Kód UT WoS článku

001438765900001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-86000352831