Assessing detector stability and image quality of thermal cameras on smartphones for medical applications: a comparative study
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14110%2F25%3A00140996" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14110/25:00140996 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11517-025-03348-4" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11517-025-03348-4</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11517-025-03348-4" target="_blank" >10.1007/s11517-025-03348-4</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Assessing detector stability and image quality of thermal cameras on smartphones for medical applications: a comparative study
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Introduction Infrared thermography (IRT) has gained significant interest in medical applications for its potential in diagnosing various conditions. Smartphone-based IRT modules offer portability and affordability, leading to increased utilization in medical settings. However, differences in performance among these modules raise questions about their reliability for medical use. Materials and methods This study compared three smartphone-based IRT modules (SmartIRT-Hikmicro, FLIR One Pro, and Seek Thermal CompactPRO-which, according to their datasheets, exhibit comparable quality and parameters. Temperature stability, surface temperature of the body, and spatial uniformity of provided images were assessed using calibrated black body measurements and surface temperature monitoring. Results The Hikmicro module exhibited the most stable temperature readings, while FLIR One Pro showed the highest temperature increase over time. Seek Thermal CompactPRO demonstrated relatively better spatial uniformity. However, discrepancies in image resolution were noted, with FLIR One and Seek modules modifying image sizes through post-processing algorithms. Conclusion While SmartIRT modules offer affordability and portability, their performance varies significantly. Temporal stability emerges as a critical factor, with the Hikmicro module demonstrating leadership in this aspect. Careful consideration and validation are necessary when selecting and utilizing SmartIRT modules for medical applications.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Assessing detector stability and image quality of thermal cameras on smartphones for medical applications: a comparative study
Popis výsledku anglicky
Introduction Infrared thermography (IRT) has gained significant interest in medical applications for its potential in diagnosing various conditions. Smartphone-based IRT modules offer portability and affordability, leading to increased utilization in medical settings. However, differences in performance among these modules raise questions about their reliability for medical use. Materials and methods This study compared three smartphone-based IRT modules (SmartIRT-Hikmicro, FLIR One Pro, and Seek Thermal CompactPRO-which, according to their datasheets, exhibit comparable quality and parameters. Temperature stability, surface temperature of the body, and spatial uniformity of provided images were assessed using calibrated black body measurements and surface temperature monitoring. Results The Hikmicro module exhibited the most stable temperature readings, while FLIR One Pro showed the highest temperature increase over time. Seek Thermal CompactPRO demonstrated relatively better spatial uniformity. However, discrepancies in image resolution were noted, with FLIR One and Seek modules modifying image sizes through post-processing algorithms. Conclusion While SmartIRT modules offer affordability and portability, their performance varies significantly. Temporal stability emerges as a critical factor, with the Hikmicro module demonstrating leadership in this aspect. Careful consideration and validation are necessary when selecting and utilizing SmartIRT modules for medical applications.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
30401 - Health-related biotechnology
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2025
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTING
ISSN
0140-0118
e-ISSN
1741-0444
Svazek periodika
63
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
9
Stát vydavatele periodika
DE - Spolková republika Německo
Počet stran výsledku
9
Strana od-do
2707-2715
Kód UT WoS článku
001459753500001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-105001930028