Response to “letter to the editor on “Long-term implant survival, functional, and radiological assessment of cemented stem in revision hip arthroplasty””

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14110%2F25%3A00143745" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14110/25:00143745 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00264-025-06592-3" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00264-025-06592-3</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-025-06592-3" target="_blank" >10.1007/s00264-025-06592-3</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Response to “letter to the editor on “Long-term implant survival, functional, and radiological assessment of cemented stem in revision hip arthroplasty””

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

We would like to thank the authors of the letter for their interest in our study and their thoughtful and detailed commentary on our article, “Long-term implant survival, functional, and radiological assessment of cemented stem in revision hip arthroplasty”. We are pleased that our work has stimulated valuable academic discussion on this important topic. We appreciate the recognition of our study’s strengths, including the long-term follow-up, sample size, and systematic evaluation of both clinical and radiographic outcomes. We agree that cemented stems remain a relevant and sometimes underutilized option in revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA), particularly in selected patient populations. Regarding the concern about functional outcomes being reported for only 118 of 183 patients, we acknowledge this as a limitation. The missing data were primarily due to loss to follow-up or incomplete documentation rather than selective exclusion. Although we did not observe systematic differences between patients with and without complete Harris Hip Score (HHS) data, we recognize the potential for bias and have addressed this in the discussion. We also appreciate the suggestion to include additional variables in the Cox regression analysis, such as bone defect classification, and surgical technique. While these details were not included in the original publication due to space constraints, we are pleased to clarify them here.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Response to “letter to the editor on “Long-term implant survival, functional, and radiological assessment of cemented stem in revision hip arthroplasty””

Popis výsledku anglicky

We would like to thank the authors of the letter for their interest in our study and their thoughtful and detailed commentary on our article, “Long-term implant survival, functional, and radiological assessment of cemented stem in revision hip arthroplasty”. We are pleased that our work has stimulated valuable academic discussion on this important topic. We appreciate the recognition of our study’s strengths, including the long-term follow-up, sample size, and systematic evaluation of both clinical and radiographic outcomes. We agree that cemented stems remain a relevant and sometimes underutilized option in revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA), particularly in selected patient populations. Regarding the concern about functional outcomes being reported for only 118 of 183 patients, we acknowledge this as a limitation. The missing data were primarily due to loss to follow-up or incomplete documentation rather than selective exclusion. Although we did not observe systematic differences between patients with and without complete Harris Hip Score (HHS) data, we recognize the potential for bias and have addressed this in the discussion. We also appreciate the suggestion to include additional variables in the Cox regression analysis, such as bone defect classification, and surgical technique. While these details were not included in the original publication due to space constraints, we are pleased to clarify them here.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30211 - Orthopaedics

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2025

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS

ISSN

0341-2695

e-ISSN

1432-5195

Svazek periodika

49

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

9

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

2

Strana od-do

2323-2324

Kód UT WoS článku

001521631800001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-105009905914