Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Proposed Denosumab Biosimilar SB16 vs Reference Denosumab in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: Phase 3 Results Up to Month 12

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14160%2F24%3A00139084" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14160/24:00139084 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:001322022600001" target="_blank" >https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:001322022600001</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgae611" target="_blank" >10.1210/clinem/dgae611</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Proposed Denosumab Biosimilar SB16 vs Reference Denosumab in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: Phase 3 Results Up to Month 12

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    Context SB16 is a proposed biosimilar to reference denosumab (DEN; brand name: Prolia).Objective This phase 3 randomized, double-blind, multicenter study evaluated the biosimilarity of SB16 to DEN in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis (NCT04664959).Design The study included 457 postmenopausal osteoporosis patients who had a lumbar spine or total hip T-score between -2.5 and -4. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either 60 mg of SB16 or DEN subcutaneously at month 0 and month 6. At month 12, patients were rerandomized to continue with the assigned treatment or switch from DEN to SB16 up to month 18. This report includes results up to month 12.Methods The primary endpoint was the percent change from baseline in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) at month 12. Secondary endpoints including the percent change from baseline in BMD of the lumbar spine (except for month 12), total hip, and femoral neck; pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic (serum C-telopeptide of type I collagen, and procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide), safety, and immunogenicity profiles were measured up to month 12.Results The least-squares mean differences in percent change from baseline in lumbar spine BMD at month 12 were 0.33% (90% CI, -0.25 to 0.91) in the full analysis set and 0.39% (95% CI, -0.36 to 1.13) in the per-protocol set; both within the predefined equivalence margin. The secondary endpoints were comparable between the 2 treatment groups.Conclusion The reported efficacy, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, safety, and immunogenicity data support the biosimilarity of SB16 to DEN.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Proposed Denosumab Biosimilar SB16 vs Reference Denosumab in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: Phase 3 Results Up to Month 12

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    Context SB16 is a proposed biosimilar to reference denosumab (DEN; brand name: Prolia).Objective This phase 3 randomized, double-blind, multicenter study evaluated the biosimilarity of SB16 to DEN in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis (NCT04664959).Design The study included 457 postmenopausal osteoporosis patients who had a lumbar spine or total hip T-score between -2.5 and -4. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either 60 mg of SB16 or DEN subcutaneously at month 0 and month 6. At month 12, patients were rerandomized to continue with the assigned treatment or switch from DEN to SB16 up to month 18. This report includes results up to month 12.Methods The primary endpoint was the percent change from baseline in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) at month 12. Secondary endpoints including the percent change from baseline in BMD of the lumbar spine (except for month 12), total hip, and femoral neck; pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic (serum C-telopeptide of type I collagen, and procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide), safety, and immunogenicity profiles were measured up to month 12.Results The least-squares mean differences in percent change from baseline in lumbar spine BMD at month 12 were 0.33% (90% CI, -0.25 to 0.91) in the full analysis set and 0.39% (95% CI, -0.36 to 1.13) in the per-protocol set; both within the predefined equivalence margin. The secondary endpoints were comparable between the 2 treatment groups.Conclusion The reported efficacy, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, safety, and immunogenicity data support the biosimilarity of SB16 to DEN.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    30202 - Endocrinology and metabolism (including diabetes, hormones)

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2024

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY &amp; METABOLISM

  • ISSN

    0021-972X

  • e-ISSN

    1945-7197

  • Svazek periodika

    Neuveden

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    Neuveden

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    US - Spojené státy americké

  • Počet stran výsledku

    8

  • Strana od-do

    1-8

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    001322022600001

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus