Proposed Denosumab Biosimilar SB16 vs Reference Denosumab in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: Phase 3 Results Up to Month 12
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14160%2F24%3A00139084" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14160/24:00139084 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:001322022600001" target="_blank" >https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:001322022600001</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgae611" target="_blank" >10.1210/clinem/dgae611</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Proposed Denosumab Biosimilar SB16 vs Reference Denosumab in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: Phase 3 Results Up to Month 12
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Context SB16 is a proposed biosimilar to reference denosumab (DEN; brand name: Prolia).Objective This phase 3 randomized, double-blind, multicenter study evaluated the biosimilarity of SB16 to DEN in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis (NCT04664959).Design The study included 457 postmenopausal osteoporosis patients who had a lumbar spine or total hip T-score between -2.5 and -4. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either 60 mg of SB16 or DEN subcutaneously at month 0 and month 6. At month 12, patients were rerandomized to continue with the assigned treatment or switch from DEN to SB16 up to month 18. This report includes results up to month 12.Methods The primary endpoint was the percent change from baseline in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) at month 12. Secondary endpoints including the percent change from baseline in BMD of the lumbar spine (except for month 12), total hip, and femoral neck; pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic (serum C-telopeptide of type I collagen, and procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide), safety, and immunogenicity profiles were measured up to month 12.Results The least-squares mean differences in percent change from baseline in lumbar spine BMD at month 12 were 0.33% (90% CI, -0.25 to 0.91) in the full analysis set and 0.39% (95% CI, -0.36 to 1.13) in the per-protocol set; both within the predefined equivalence margin. The secondary endpoints were comparable between the 2 treatment groups.Conclusion The reported efficacy, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, safety, and immunogenicity data support the biosimilarity of SB16 to DEN.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Proposed Denosumab Biosimilar SB16 vs Reference Denosumab in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: Phase 3 Results Up to Month 12
Popis výsledku anglicky
Context SB16 is a proposed biosimilar to reference denosumab (DEN; brand name: Prolia).Objective This phase 3 randomized, double-blind, multicenter study evaluated the biosimilarity of SB16 to DEN in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis (NCT04664959).Design The study included 457 postmenopausal osteoporosis patients who had a lumbar spine or total hip T-score between -2.5 and -4. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either 60 mg of SB16 or DEN subcutaneously at month 0 and month 6. At month 12, patients were rerandomized to continue with the assigned treatment or switch from DEN to SB16 up to month 18. This report includes results up to month 12.Methods The primary endpoint was the percent change from baseline in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) at month 12. Secondary endpoints including the percent change from baseline in BMD of the lumbar spine (except for month 12), total hip, and femoral neck; pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic (serum C-telopeptide of type I collagen, and procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide), safety, and immunogenicity profiles were measured up to month 12.Results The least-squares mean differences in percent change from baseline in lumbar spine BMD at month 12 were 0.33% (90% CI, -0.25 to 0.91) in the full analysis set and 0.39% (95% CI, -0.36 to 1.13) in the per-protocol set; both within the predefined equivalence margin. The secondary endpoints were comparable between the 2 treatment groups.Conclusion The reported efficacy, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, safety, and immunogenicity data support the biosimilarity of SB16 to DEN.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
30202 - Endocrinology and metabolism (including diabetes, hormones)
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2024
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
ISSN
0021-972X
e-ISSN
1945-7197
Svazek periodika
Neuveden
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
Neuveden
Stát vydavatele periodika
US - Spojené státy americké
Počet stran výsledku
8
Strana od-do
1-8
Kód UT WoS článku
001322022600001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—