Does ?Dominating? Mean ?Mainstream?? ? Official Taiwan Literature in 1945?47

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14210%2F12%3A00081825" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14210/12:00081825 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Does ?Dominating? Mean ?Mainstream?? ? Official Taiwan Literature in 1945?47

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

When discussing mainstream literature, one has to think about questions such as the following: What is mainstream literature? What is the canon? What is the relationship between the two? Who has the authority to define such literature? The question of how to define Taiwanese culture and literature and their relationship with Chinese culture became a contested ideological issue. The first few years after the war proved to be a crucial period because it was at this time that the official cultural policy frameworks for the nation building process were established. This article will first introduce the agent(s) occupying dominant positions in Taiwan?s literary field in 1945?47. Secondly, it will look closely at the definition of literature they propagated.The authority they used to reinforce their definition of Taiwan literature and culture was granted by their political affiliation and the definition itself was strongly influenced by contemporary ideological tenets.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Does ?Dominating? Mean ?Mainstream?? ? Official Taiwan Literature in 1945?47

Popis výsledku anglicky

When discussing mainstream literature, one has to think about questions such as the following: What is mainstream literature? What is the canon? What is the relationship between the two? Who has the authority to define such literature? The question of how to define Taiwanese culture and literature and their relationship with Chinese culture became a contested ideological issue. The first few years after the war proved to be a crucial period because it was at this time that the official cultural policy frameworks for the nation building process were established. This article will first introduce the agent(s) occupying dominant positions in Taiwan?s literary field in 1945?47. Secondly, it will look closely at the definition of literature they propagated.The authority they used to reinforce their definition of Taiwan literature and culture was granted by their political affiliation and the definition itself was strongly influenced by contemporary ideological tenets.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AJ - Písemnictví, mas–media, audiovize

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2012

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Studia Orientalia Slovaca

ISSN

1336-3786

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

11

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

SK - Slovenská republika

Počet stran výsledku

22

Strana od-do

5-26

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—