Explicating the Notion of Truth Within Transparent Intensional Logic

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14210%2F14%3A00075580" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14210/14:00075580 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06080-4_12" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06080-4_12</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06080-4_12" target="_blank" >10.1007/978-3-319-06080-4_12</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Explicating the Notion of Truth Within Transparent Intensional Logic

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The approach of Transparent Intensional Logic to truth differs significantly from rivalling approaches. The notion of truth is explicated by a three-level system of notions whereas the upper-level notions depend on the lower-level ones. Truth of possibleworld propositions lies in the bottom. Truth of hyperintensional entities ? called constructions ? which determine propositions is dependent on it. Truth of expressions depends on truth of their meanings; the meanings are explicated as constructions. The approach thus adopts a particular hyperintensional theory of meanings; truth of extralinguistic items is taken as primary. Truth of expressions is also dependent, either explicitly or implicitly, on language (its notion is thus also explicated within the approach). On each level, strong and weak variants of the notions are distinguished because the approach employs the Principle of Bivalence which adopts partiality.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Explicating the Notion of Truth Within Transparent Intensional Logic

Popis výsledku anglicky

The approach of Transparent Intensional Logic to truth differs significantly from rivalling approaches. The notion of truth is explicated by a three-level system of notions whereas the upper-level notions depend on the lower-level ones. Truth of possibleworld propositions lies in the bottom. Truth of hyperintensional entities ? called constructions ? which determine propositions is dependent on it. Truth of expressions depends on truth of their meanings; the meanings are explicated as constructions. The approach thus adopts a particular hyperintensional theory of meanings; truth of extralinguistic items is taken as primary. Truth of expressions is also dependent, either explicitly or implicitly, on language (its notion is thus also explicated within the approach). On each level, strong and weak variants of the notions are distinguished because the approach employs the Principle of Bivalence which adopts partiality.

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

AA - Filosofie a náboženství

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach<br>I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2014

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

Recent Trends in Philosophical Logic

ISBN

9783319060798

ISSN

1572-6126

e-ISSN

—

Počet stran výsledku

11

Strana od-do

167-177

Název nakladatele

Springer

Místo vydání

New York, Dordrecht. London, Heidelberg

Místo konání akce

Bochum (Germany)

Datum konání akce

1. 1. 2012

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

WRD - Celosvětová akce

Kód UT WoS článku

000345581100012