Hus's Reform of the Church and His Fight against Antichrist as a Phenomena of the End of Ages
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14210%2F15%3A00081306" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14210/15:00081306 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Hus's Reform of the Church and His Fight against Antichrist as a Phenomena of the End of Ages
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The contribution focused on eschatology of Jan Hus - in particular, on the topic of antichrist and the tightly related rhetoric, which are the key constituents of Hus's reformation efforts. This topic was partly presented also in comparison with Hus's predecessors ? Milíč a Matěj from Janov. The objective was to demonstrate this fact: although the early Bohemian Reformation is mostly and justifiably considered as rather monolithic in regard to the antichrist topic (the authors continue one another's work, their biblical sources are similar or identical and so is their concept of Antichrist etc., note: recently, the term "Hus's predecessors" has been challenged by F. Šmahel) , the relatively unified development of the idea of antichrist had been disrupted in one important aspect - it is the fact that, unlike in case of the other authors, Hus's eschatology cannot be labelled as apocalyptic and the usage of the term apocalyptic by Hus is questionable.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Hus's Reform of the Church and His Fight against Antichrist as a Phenomena of the End of Ages
Popis výsledku anglicky
The contribution focused on eschatology of Jan Hus - in particular, on the topic of antichrist and the tightly related rhetoric, which are the key constituents of Hus's reformation efforts. This topic was partly presented also in comparison with Hus's predecessors ? Milíč a Matěj from Janov. The objective was to demonstrate this fact: although the early Bohemian Reformation is mostly and justifiably considered as rather monolithic in regard to the antichrist topic (the authors continue one another's work, their biblical sources are similar or identical and so is their concept of Antichrist etc., note: recently, the term "Hus's predecessors" has been challenged by F. Šmahel) , the relatively unified development of the idea of antichrist had been disrupted in one important aspect - it is the fact that, unlike in case of the other authors, Hus's eschatology cannot be labelled as apocalyptic and the usage of the term apocalyptic by Hus is questionable.
Klasifikace
Druh
O - Ostatní výsledky
CEP obor
AJ - Písemnictví, mas–media, audiovize
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/GA13-21620S" target="_blank" >GA13-21620S: Magistri Iohannis Hus Opera omnia. Ediční projekt v rámci přípravy Husova výročí v roce 2015</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2015
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů