Plebiscita until 287 BC in Livy's History
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14210%2F15%3A00083271" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14210/15:00083271 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://munispace.muni.cz/index.php/munispace/catalog/book/766" target="_blank" >https://munispace.muni.cz/index.php/munispace/catalog/book/766</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.M210-7947-2015" target="_blank" >10.5817/CZ.MUNI.M210-7947-2015</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Plebiscita until 287 BC in Livy's History
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Through selected model examples, the chapter demonstrates the methodology of a historian who deals with a legal term ? a plebiscitum ? in the period of early Roman history. His/her work chiefly consists in processing preserved literary works of ancient authors whose content is primarily not of legal nature. That is why also the parts dealing with plebiscita are not extensive and the work of a historian starts already with searching and discerning those parts of texts that are concerned with the plebiscita. Such text passages that are pointing to legal terms usually take the form of short sentences or their segments, which is why the historian must know the way in which the legal terms or acts can be expressed by ancient authors (what phrases can be used). Recognition can be unequivocal but also unclear, and in such cases it is helpful if the events in question are mentioned in some other, extant ancient sources.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Plebiscita until 287 BC in Livy's History
Popis výsledku anglicky
Through selected model examples, the chapter demonstrates the methodology of a historian who deals with a legal term ? a plebiscitum ? in the period of early Roman history. His/her work chiefly consists in processing preserved literary works of ancient authors whose content is primarily not of legal nature. That is why also the parts dealing with plebiscita are not extensive and the work of a historian starts already with searching and discerning those parts of texts that are concerned with the plebiscita. Such text passages that are pointing to legal terms usually take the form of short sentences or their segments, which is why the historian must know the way in which the legal terms or acts can be expressed by ancient authors (what phrases can be used). Recognition can be unequivocal but also unclear, and in such cases it is helpful if the events in question are mentioned in some other, extant ancient sources.
Klasifikace
Druh
C - Kapitola v odborné knize
CEP obor
AB - Dějiny
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2015
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název knihy nebo sborníku
On Research Methodology in Ancient and Byzantine History
ISBN
9788021079465
Počet stran výsledku
9
Strana od-do
53-61
Počet stran knihy
193
Název nakladatele
Masaryk University
Místo vydání
Brno
Kód UT WoS kapitoly
—