Journal publishing models in the Czech Republic

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14210%2F15%3A00085014" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14210/15:00085014 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1087/20150403" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1087/20150403</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1087/20150403" target="_blank" >10.1087/20150403</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Journal publishing models in the Czech Republic

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

In 2014 we undertook a survey on the shifts in scholarly publishing in connection with the introduction of open access journals. The editors of more than half of the journals published in the Czech Republic participated in the first part of the study. Anextensive questionnaire survey that addressed about 600 editorial boards of specialized journals was performed. We found the majority of journals to be published by smaller and non-traditional publishers. One of the most remarkable results was the finding that if we focus on economic models and peer-review models, open access journals do not differ considerably from other journals. Rather than according to the mode of access, much more significant differences may be observed between different types ofpublishers and between individual fields. It seems that on a local level the expectations associated with open access have not been fulfilled and the difference between subscription-based journals and open access journals is not so sharp.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Journal publishing models in the Czech Republic

Popis výsledku anglicky

In 2014 we undertook a survey on the shifts in scholarly publishing in connection with the introduction of open access journals. The editors of more than half of the journals published in the Czech Republic participated in the first part of the study. Anextensive questionnaire survey that addressed about 600 editorial boards of specialized journals was performed. We found the majority of journals to be published by smaller and non-traditional publishers. One of the most remarkable results was the finding that if we focus on economic models and peer-review models, open access journals do not differ considerably from other journals. Rather than according to the mode of access, much more significant differences may be observed between different types ofpublishers and between individual fields. It seems that on a local level the expectations associated with open access have not been fulfilled and the difference between subscription-based journals and open access journals is not so sharp.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AF - Dokumentace, knihovnictví, práce s informacemi

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2015

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Learned Publishing

ISSN

0953-1513

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

28

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

4

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

11

Strana od-do

239-249

Kód UT WoS článku

000362390400002

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—