The Russian View of a “Peripheral” Region. Nikodim P. Kondakov and the Southern Caucasus

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14210%2F16%3A00088186" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14210/16:00088186 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The Russian View of a “Peripheral” Region. Nikodim P. Kondakov and the Southern Caucasus

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Because of the late nineteenth-century studies of Russian scholars, our understanding of medieval Caucasus seems to be largely determinate by the Russian imperial aspiration during the reign of Alexander III (1881–1894) and Nicolas I (1894– 1917). For these Tsars, the Caucasus was, before all, a uniform region with no distinction between Armenia and Georgia. Following this idea, scholars like Nikodim P. Kondakov (1844–1825) or Dimitrij Bakradze (1826–1890) presented the medieval region as a homogenous phenomenon, regardless of the cultural and political reality of the Middle ages. Through the imperial glance, the Caucasus was just the periphery of an international empire. In the same way, the medieval artistic cultures of the southern Caucasus were presented by the aforementioned scholars as a cultural periphery of the Byzantine world. Despite of the incredible quality of Georgian enamels or of the Armenian architecture, the art of this region was thus considered provincial.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The Russian View of a “Peripheral” Region. Nikodim P. Kondakov and the Southern Caucasus

Popis výsledku anglicky

Because of the late nineteenth-century studies of Russian scholars, our understanding of medieval Caucasus seems to be largely determinate by the Russian imperial aspiration during the reign of Alexander III (1881–1894) and Nicolas I (1894– 1917). For these Tsars, the Caucasus was, before all, a uniform region with no distinction between Armenia and Georgia. Following this idea, scholars like Nikodim P. Kondakov (1844–1825) or Dimitrij Bakradze (1826–1890) presented the medieval region as a homogenous phenomenon, regardless of the cultural and political reality of the Middle ages. Through the imperial glance, the Caucasus was just the periphery of an international empire. In the same way, the medieval artistic cultures of the southern Caucasus were presented by the aforementioned scholars as a cultural periphery of the Byzantine world. Despite of the incredible quality of Georgian enamels or of the Armenian architecture, the art of this region was thus considered provincial.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AL - Umění, architektura, kulturní dědictví

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GB14-36521G" target="_blank" >GB14-36521G: Centrum pro transdisciplinární výzkum kulturních fenoménů ve středoevropských dějinách: obraz, komunikace, jednání</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2016

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Convivium. Exchanges and Interactions in the Arts of Medieval Europe, Byzantium, and the Mediterranean. Seminarium Kondakovianum Series Nova

ISSN

2336-3452

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

2016

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

Supplementum

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

16

Strana od-do

20-35

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—