Hydronymia Rgvedica

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14210%2F16%3A00088373" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14210/16:00088373 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/136172" target="_blank" >http://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/136172</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Hydronymia Rgvedica

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

On the basis of complete textual documentation this article presents the geographical identification and etymological analyses of 29 hydronyms attested in the Rgveda. It is possible to conclude that the center of gravity of the early Vedic Indo-Aryans was situated in the North-West of the Indian subcontinent, in the basin of the mid- and upper stream of the Indus, plus basins of the upper streams of the Ganges &amp; Yamuna. Most of the hydronyms analyzed here are etymologizable as Indo-Aryan in the first approximation, but this could be a result of secondary reinterpretation (“folk etymology”). In only two cases (6.9%) non-Indo-Aryan, namely Burushaski, etymologies seem more probable. In other four cases (13.8%) there are Dravidian alternative solutions. The hypotheses of Sino-Tibetan or Munda (Austro-Asiatic) origin of some hydronyms were also tested, but were not confirmed. It means, for c. 1/5 hydronyms attested in Rgveda the pre-Indo-Aryan origin is more or less probable.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Hydronymia Rgvedica

Popis výsledku anglicky

On the basis of complete textual documentation this article presents the geographical identification and etymological analyses of 29 hydronyms attested in the Rgveda. It is possible to conclude that the center of gravity of the early Vedic Indo-Aryans was situated in the North-West of the Indian subcontinent, in the basin of the mid- and upper stream of the Indus, plus basins of the upper streams of the Ganges &amp; Yamuna. Most of the hydronyms analyzed here are etymologizable as Indo-Aryan in the first approximation, but this could be a result of secondary reinterpretation (“folk etymology”). In only two cases (6.9%) non-Indo-Aryan, namely Burushaski, etymologies seem more probable. In other four cases (13.8%) there are Dravidian alternative solutions. The hypotheses of Sino-Tibetan or Munda (Austro-Asiatic) origin of some hydronyms were also tested, but were not confirmed. It means, for c. 1/5 hydronyms attested in Rgveda the pre-Indo-Aryan origin is more or less probable.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AI - Jazykověda

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA15-12215S" target="_blank" >GA15-12215S: Altajská hypotéza - argumenty, protiargumenty a jejich precizace</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2016

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Linguistica Brunensia

ISSN

1803-7410

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

64

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

48

Strana od-do

7-54

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—