Making Evolutionary Science of Religion an Integral Part of Cognitive Science of Religion

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14210%2F18%3A00105411" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14210/18:00105411 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004385375_010" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004385375_010</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004385375_010" target="_blank" >10.1163/9789004385375_010</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Making Evolutionary Science of Religion an Integral Part of Cognitive Science of Religion

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Standard Cognitive Science of Religion (CSR) Model treats religion as an evolutionary by-product and considers proximate mechanisms, and not ultimate causes, as intrinsic to CSR explanative objectives. Such theoretical stance suggests that the full spectrum of evolutionary analyses is yet to be embraced by the young field. I argue that by transforming the originally legitimate by-product argument aimed against bad practice within the adaptationist programme into an argument against the adaptationist programme itself, and by making the by-product position a default point of departure, CSR turned standard evolutionary logic on its head hampering its own advancements. Furthermore, discussing Tinbergen´s Four Whys, I stress that all four questions of ontogeny, phylogeny, mechanism, and function are of equal importance in our strive for the full CSR project.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Making Evolutionary Science of Religion an Integral Part of Cognitive Science of Religion

Popis výsledku anglicky

Standard Cognitive Science of Religion (CSR) Model treats religion as an evolutionary by-product and considers proximate mechanisms, and not ultimate causes, as intrinsic to CSR explanative objectives. Such theoretical stance suggests that the full spectrum of evolutionary analyses is yet to be embraced by the young field. I argue that by transforming the originally legitimate by-product argument aimed against bad practice within the adaptationist programme into an argument against the adaptationist programme itself, and by making the by-product position a default point of departure, CSR turned standard evolutionary logic on its head hampering its own advancements. Furthermore, discussing Tinbergen´s Four Whys, I stress that all four questions of ontogeny, phylogeny, mechanism, and function are of equal importance in our strive for the full CSR project.

Druh

C - Kapitola v odborné knize

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60304 - Religious studies

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/EE2.3.20.0048" target="_blank" >EE2.3.20.0048: Laboratoř pro experimentální výzkum náboženství</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2018

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název knihy nebo sborníku

Evolution, Cognition, and the History of Religion : A New Synthesis

ISBN

9789004385375

Počet stran výsledku

18

Strana od-do

141-158

Počet stran knihy

670

Název nakladatele

Brill

Místo vydání

Leiden, Boston

Kód UT WoS kapitoly

—