Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Corruption and Unfair Practices in the Ancient Olympic Games

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14210%2F19%3A00110208" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14210/19:00110208 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://www.ishpes.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Abstracts2019.pdf" target="_blank" >https://www.ishpes.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Abstracts2019.pdf</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Corruption and Unfair Practices in the Ancient Olympic Games

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    The Ancient Olympic Games were organized by the Olympic Council, formed by the elites of Elis – the government of Elis, so-called "Council of Elis" – and by hellanodikai, “judges of the Hellenes/Greeks“. The Council accepted the appeal of the contestants and their coaches against the decisions of hellanodikai. Most of the games were organized by the same elites, if they were changed, it was because of war; there were no bids. It eliminated some kinds of corruption. The main questions of the paper are: Did the corruption and unfair practice exist in the ancient Olympics? What examples of these do we have? As the main evidence we will use the primary sources; we will analyze and compare them. The participation of the first woman in the Olympic Games – Kyniska of Sparta – and the intervening of Agesilaus II, the great Spartan king and Kyniska´s brother could be understood as such example of possible unfair practices. Other corruption cases were connected with Nero, the emperor of the Julio-Claudian dynasty. Typical examples of the ancient Olympic corruption were reflected by Zanes, the statues of Zeus. The data for the paper were gained mainly from primary sources (especially Pausanias, Philostratus, Plutarchos and Xenophon) and relevant professional literature (e.g. Christesen, Crowther, Golden and Miller). The methods used were a comparative method, biography method, progressive method, direct and indirect methods. As a way of processing data, the results from primary and professional literature were compared, and further the criticism of the sources, interpretation and synthesis were employed.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Corruption and Unfair Practices in the Ancient Olympic Games

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    The Ancient Olympic Games were organized by the Olympic Council, formed by the elites of Elis – the government of Elis, so-called "Council of Elis" – and by hellanodikai, “judges of the Hellenes/Greeks“. The Council accepted the appeal of the contestants and their coaches against the decisions of hellanodikai. Most of the games were organized by the same elites, if they were changed, it was because of war; there were no bids. It eliminated some kinds of corruption. The main questions of the paper are: Did the corruption and unfair practice exist in the ancient Olympics? What examples of these do we have? As the main evidence we will use the primary sources; we will analyze and compare them. The participation of the first woman in the Olympic Games – Kyniska of Sparta – and the intervening of Agesilaus II, the great Spartan king and Kyniska´s brother could be understood as such example of possible unfair practices. Other corruption cases were connected with Nero, the emperor of the Julio-Claudian dynasty. Typical examples of the ancient Olympic corruption were reflected by Zanes, the statues of Zeus. The data for the paper were gained mainly from primary sources (especially Pausanias, Philostratus, Plutarchos and Xenophon) and relevant professional literature (e.g. Christesen, Crowther, Golden and Miller). The methods used were a comparative method, biography method, progressive method, direct and indirect methods. As a way of processing data, the results from primary and professional literature were compared, and further the criticism of the sources, interpretation and synthesis were employed.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    O - Ostatní výsledky

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    60101 - History (history of science and technology to be 6.3, history of specific sciences to be under the respective headings)

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2019

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů