Etruscan morals – Interpretation of ancient writings and archaeological sources
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14210%2F19%3A00112663" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14210/19:00112663 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://antickaspolecnost.cz/akce-a-galerie/2019" target="_blank" >https://antickaspolecnost.cz/akce-a-galerie/2019</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Etruscan morals – Interpretation of ancient writings and archaeological sources
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The presentation aims to the explanation of the literary stereotype of Etruscan hedonism and moral corruption. The essential wellsprings of the presentation are represented by the ancient sources in Latin and Greek from different periods treating Etruscan culture and society. Interdisciplinary approach (for example between archaeology, philology, and archaeobotany) involves many positive comparative alternatives in the investigation of the Etruscan issue. Although archaeological sources are an important and, above all, more reliable source of information, written sources and fragments of ancient authors complete the contemporary context and therefore should not be underestimated. Comparison of ancient written sources with archaeological data proves that the ancient writers were one-sided, sometimes without a critical approach to the sources, which could cause the misconception of certain components of Etruscan culture. There could be several reasons why it was so. The main focus of this presentation is the examination of these reasons.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Etruscan morals – Interpretation of ancient writings and archaeological sources
Popis výsledku anglicky
The presentation aims to the explanation of the literary stereotype of Etruscan hedonism and moral corruption. The essential wellsprings of the presentation are represented by the ancient sources in Latin and Greek from different periods treating Etruscan culture and society. Interdisciplinary approach (for example between archaeology, philology, and archaeobotany) involves many positive comparative alternatives in the investigation of the Etruscan issue. Although archaeological sources are an important and, above all, more reliable source of information, written sources and fragments of ancient authors complete the contemporary context and therefore should not be underestimated. Comparison of ancient written sources with archaeological data proves that the ancient writers were one-sided, sometimes without a critical approach to the sources, which could cause the misconception of certain components of Etruscan culture. There could be several reasons why it was so. The main focus of this presentation is the examination of these reasons.
Klasifikace
Druh
O - Ostatní výsledky
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
60102 - Archaeology
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2019
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů