Hearing voices : reapproaching medieval inquisition records
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14210%2F22%3A00129237" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14210/22:00129237 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/13/12/1175" target="_blank" >https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/13/12/1175</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rel13121175" target="_blank" >10.3390/rel13121175</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Hearing voices : reapproaching medieval inquisition records
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The records of medieval heresy inquisitions have been a subject of controversy ever since their rediscovery by historians. The detail they convey of specific social interactions has continued to inspire generations of scholars, while the coercive conditions of their production have placed strong caveats over their interpretation. This article offers a comprehensive review of the debate on the uses of inquisition records, encompassing scholarship across multiple languages and schools of thought. It also highlights some shortcomings in that debate, e.g., the overrepresentation of inquisitors’ choices; the claim that the use of torture led automatically to reproducing outlandish inquisitorial fears; and the idea that exceptional detail correlates with reliability. The article concludes with the proposal of the Dissident Networks Project (DISSINET) to use structured data within a new variety of quantitative history. This method, founded on the Computer-Assisted Semantic Text Modelling approach that DISSINET has pioneered, is well-suited to addressing the biases of inquisition documents and opening them to scrutiny, thus providing a significant complement to close reading.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Hearing voices : reapproaching medieval inquisition records
Popis výsledku anglicky
The records of medieval heresy inquisitions have been a subject of controversy ever since their rediscovery by historians. The detail they convey of specific social interactions has continued to inspire generations of scholars, while the coercive conditions of their production have placed strong caveats over their interpretation. This article offers a comprehensive review of the debate on the uses of inquisition records, encompassing scholarship across multiple languages and schools of thought. It also highlights some shortcomings in that debate, e.g., the overrepresentation of inquisitors’ choices; the claim that the use of torture led automatically to reproducing outlandish inquisitorial fears; and the idea that exceptional detail correlates with reliability. The article concludes with the proposal of the Dissident Networks Project (DISSINET) to use structured data within a new variety of quantitative history. This method, founded on the Computer-Assisted Semantic Text Modelling approach that DISSINET has pioneered, is well-suited to addressing the biases of inquisition documents and opening them to scrutiny, thus providing a significant complement to close reading.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
60304 - Religious studies
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/GX19-26975X" target="_blank" >GX19-26975X: Nekonformní náboženské kultury ve středověké Evropě z pohledu analýzy sociálních sítí a geografických informačních systémů</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2022
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Religions
ISSN
2077-1444
e-ISSN
2077-1444
Svazek periodika
13
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
12
Stát vydavatele periodika
CH - Švýcarská konfederace
Počet stran výsledku
25
Strana od-do
1-25
Kód UT WoS článku
000903051000001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85144669343