Modeling systems of sentencing in early inquisition trials : Crime, social connectivity, and punishment in the register of Peter Seila (1241–2)

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14210%2F23%3A00134287" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14210/23:00134287 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01615440.2023.2270404" target="_blank" >https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01615440.2023.2270404</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01615440.2023.2270404" target="_blank" >10.1080/01615440.2023.2270404</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Modeling systems of sentencing in early inquisition trials : Crime, social connectivity, and punishment in the register of Peter Seila (1241–2)

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This article, published in the Web of Science History first-decile journal Historical Methods, is a significant outcome of the GAČR-EXPRO and ERC Consolidator Grant-funded Dissident Networks Project (DISSINET), based on comprehensive formal data analysis. It disentangles the intricate relations between crime and punishment in earliest medieval inquisitions. It builds on the fact that despite significant research on the techniques of repression employed by medieval inquisitors against religious dissidents, the case-level influences on the penances they meted out are understood only vaguely: the extent to which sentencing “systems” existed is unknown. To overcome this, we apply formal methods – an exploratory analysis supported by crisp-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis, and statistical modeling founded on multiple linear regression – to the large and historically significant register of Peter Seila (1241–2), captured as structured data via a statement-based approach entitled “Computer-Assisted Semantic Text Modelling” (CASTEMO). The results show that Peter systematically weighted different types of crimes and dissident interactions when sentencing; they do not suggest, however, that he was influenced by accomplicity or kinship among the sentenced.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Modeling systems of sentencing in early inquisition trials : Crime, social connectivity, and punishment in the register of Peter Seila (1241–2)

Popis výsledku anglicky

This article, published in the Web of Science History first-decile journal Historical Methods, is a significant outcome of the GAČR-EXPRO and ERC Consolidator Grant-funded Dissident Networks Project (DISSINET), based on comprehensive formal data analysis. It disentangles the intricate relations between crime and punishment in earliest medieval inquisitions. It builds on the fact that despite significant research on the techniques of repression employed by medieval inquisitors against religious dissidents, the case-level influences on the penances they meted out are understood only vaguely: the extent to which sentencing “systems” existed is unknown. To overcome this, we apply formal methods – an exploratory analysis supported by crisp-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis, and statistical modeling founded on multiple linear regression – to the large and historically significant register of Peter Seila (1241–2), captured as structured data via a statement-based approach entitled “Computer-Assisted Semantic Text Modelling” (CASTEMO). The results show that Peter systematically weighted different types of crimes and dissident interactions when sentencing; they do not suggest, however, that he was influenced by accomplicity or kinship among the sentenced.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60304 - Religious studies

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GX19-26975X" target="_blank" >GX19-26975X: Nekonformní náboženské kultury ve středověké Evropě z pohledu analýzy sociálních sítí a geografických informačních systémů</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History

ISSN

0161-5440

e-ISSN

1940-1906

Svazek periodika

56

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

22

Strana od-do

176-197

Kód UT WoS článku

001097861700001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85176223430