Conflicts between Fundamental Rights in the Jurisprudence of the Czech Constitutional Court

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F08%3A00041589" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/08:00041589 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Conflicts between Fundamental Rights in the Jurisprudence of the Czech Constitutional Court

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

It is generally assumed that the Czech Constitutional Court is to a significant degree influenced by the jurisprudence of the German Federal Constitutional Court. At first sight, conflicts between fundamental rights do not seem to be an exception. Indeed, the Czech Constitutional Court borrowed a version of practical concordance and a three-step test of proportionality. However, this paper reveals that a weighing formula of the Czech Constitutional Court departs from the one applied by its German counterpart. Furthermore, the paper argues that different criteria apply in abstract and concrete judicial review on the one hand, and individual constitutional complaint procedure on the other. More specifically, it points to two major differences between theabovementioned types of procedure: (1) reversal order of the two components (i.e. balancing and a version of practical concordance) of the proportionality test in the strict sense; and (2) different content of the balancing component.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Conflicts between Fundamental Rights in the Jurisprudence of the Czech Constitutional Court

Popis výsledku anglicky

It is generally assumed that the Czech Constitutional Court is to a significant degree influenced by the jurisprudence of the German Federal Constitutional Court. At first sight, conflicts between fundamental rights do not seem to be an exception. Indeed, the Czech Constitutional Court borrowed a version of practical concordance and a three-step test of proportionality. However, this paper reveals that a weighing formula of the Czech Constitutional Court departs from the one applied by its German counterpart. Furthermore, the paper argues that different criteria apply in abstract and concrete judicial review on the one hand, and individual constitutional complaint procedure on the other. More specifically, it points to two major differences between theabovementioned types of procedure: (1) reversal order of the two components (i.e. balancing and a version of practical concordance) of the proportionality test in the strict sense; and (2) different content of the balancing component.

Druh

C - Kapitola v odborné knize

CEP obor

AG - Právní vědy

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2008

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název knihy nebo sborníku

Conflicts Between Fundamental Rights

ISBN

978-90-5095-779-3

Počet stran výsledku

31

Strana od-do

—

Počet stran knihy

690

Název nakladatele

Intersentia

Místo vydání

Oxford

Kód UT WoS kapitoly

—