The Pitfall of Interpreting Rome II Regulation Consistently with Brussels I Regulation

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F09%3A00029505" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/09:00029505 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The Pitfall of Interpreting Rome II Regulation Consistently with Brussels I Regulation

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This article addresses several aspects of interaction between procedural and conflict rule regulation in private international law both of which are subject to unification process under the European Community law. They are interdependent of each other, and use the same or similar terms on many occasions. Problems with interpretation arise in application of these legal regulations. The European Court of Justice addresses them more or less successfully. As demonstrated in this article, the interpretationof procedural rules of regulation may contribute to the clarification of the conflict rules and vice versa. It can be even said that the mutual interaction of conflict rules and procedural rules through interpretation is both unavoidable and desirable.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The Pitfall of Interpreting Rome II Regulation Consistently with Brussels I Regulation

Popis výsledku anglicky

This article addresses several aspects of interaction between procedural and conflict rule regulation in private international law both of which are subject to unification process under the European Community law. They are interdependent of each other, and use the same or similar terms on many occasions. Problems with interpretation arise in application of these legal regulations. The European Court of Justice addresses them more or less successfully. As demonstrated in this article, the interpretationof procedural rules of regulation may contribute to the clarification of the conflict rules and vice versa. It can be even said that the mutual interaction of conflict rules and procedural rules through interpretation is both unavoidable and desirable.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AG - Právní vědy

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GP407%2F08%2FP624" target="_blank" >GP407/08/P624: Delikty z pohledu mezinárodního práva soukromého</a><br>

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2009

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Jurisprudencija

ISSN

1392-6195

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

2009

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

LT - Litevská republika

Počet stran výsledku

16

Strana od-do

—

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—