The Reference for a Preliminary Ruling and the Right to a Statutory Judge - Is the Czech Justice more European than the European Union Again?

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F09%3A00037918" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/09:00037918 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The Reference for a Preliminary Ruling and the Right to a Statutory Judge - Is the Czech Justice more European than the European Union Again?

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The article analysis 2 decisions of the Czech Constitutional Court (CCC) related to the EU. The 1st decision concerns the constitutionality of the Lisbon Treaty and the second one is about the duty to make a reference for a preliminary ruling. The 1st decision was decided against the settled case law of the ECJ. The challenged parts of the Lisbon Treaty were found compatible with the Czech constitution; however the CCC held that it might not be bound by the principle of primacy of EU law in future. Contrary to this eurosceptic decision in the second judgment the CCC decided that the Czech Supreme Administrative Court (SAC) violated the fundamental right of the complainant to a statutory judge guaranteed by the Czech Charter of Fundamental Rights. The breach was caused by the fact that the SAC did not, being the court of last instance, referred to the ECJ for a preliminary ruling. In these two decisions the Czech justice has proved again, that its approach to the EC law is unpredictable

Název v anglickém jazyce

The Reference for a Preliminary Ruling and the Right to a Statutory Judge - Is the Czech Justice more European than the European Union Again?

Popis výsledku anglicky

The article analysis 2 decisions of the Czech Constitutional Court (CCC) related to the EU. The 1st decision concerns the constitutionality of the Lisbon Treaty and the second one is about the duty to make a reference for a preliminary ruling. The 1st decision was decided against the settled case law of the ECJ. The challenged parts of the Lisbon Treaty were found compatible with the Czech constitution; however the CCC held that it might not be bound by the principle of primacy of EU law in future. Contrary to this eurosceptic decision in the second judgment the CCC decided that the Czech Supreme Administrative Court (SAC) violated the fundamental right of the complainant to a statutory judge guaranteed by the Czech Charter of Fundamental Rights. The breach was caused by the fact that the SAC did not, being the court of last instance, referred to the ECJ for a preliminary ruling. In these two decisions the Czech justice has proved again, that its approach to the EC law is unpredictable

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

AG - Právní vědy

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2009

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

The Role and Place of Law in a Society Based on Knowledge

ISBN

978-973-144-283-9

ISSN

—

e-ISSN

—

Počet stran výsledku

7

Strana od-do

—

Název nakladatele

?ACADEMICA BRÂNCUSI? Publisher

Místo vydání

Târgu-Jiu

Místo konání akce

Târgu-Jiu

Datum konání akce

1. 1. 2009

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

EUR - Evropská akce

Kód UT WoS článku

—