A Few Observations on Choice of Law

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F10%3A00043988" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/10:00043988 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

A Few Observations on Choice of Law

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Th is paper from the area of PIL addresses certain aspects of the choice of law under the universal collision rules of Community law for Rome I Regulation and Rome II Regulation. The authors discuss the institution of choice of law from the vantage pointof Czech PIL, and in doing so reflect the differences brought about by the fact that the Rome I came into being by way of a transformation of an international convention. Since these two rules of community law contain no longer any choice-of-law conceptin its pure form, but various forms of limitations, the authors engage in an analysis of these individual types. Their rejection of the generally accepted doctrine according to which choice of law is permissible in intrastate obligations appears controversial. Situations that were possible at the time at which the Rome Convention was still in force are no longer permissible under the Rome I and Rome II Regulations. Other limitations of the choice of law have also found the interest of t

Název v anglickém jazyce

A Few Observations on Choice of Law

Popis výsledku anglicky

Th is paper from the area of PIL addresses certain aspects of the choice of law under the universal collision rules of Community law for Rome I Regulation and Rome II Regulation. The authors discuss the institution of choice of law from the vantage pointof Czech PIL, and in doing so reflect the differences brought about by the fact that the Rome I came into being by way of a transformation of an international convention. Since these two rules of community law contain no longer any choice-of-law conceptin its pure form, but various forms of limitations, the authors engage in an analysis of these individual types. Their rejection of the generally accepted doctrine according to which choice of law is permissible in intrastate obligations appears controversial. Situations that were possible at the time at which the Rome Convention was still in force are no longer permissible under the Rome I and Rome II Regulations. Other limitations of the choice of law have also found the interest of t

Druh

C - Kapitola v odborné knize

CEP obor

AG - Právní vědy

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GP407%2F08%2FP624" target="_blank" >GP407/08/P624: Delikty z pohledu mezinárodního práva soukromého</a><br>

Návaznosti

Z - Vyzkumny zamer (s odkazem do CEZ)<br>S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2010

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název knihy nebo sborníku

Second Decade Ahead: Tracing the Global Crisis

ISBN

978-1-57823-272-7

Počet stran výsledku

21

Strana od-do

—

Počet stran knihy

364

Název nakladatele

Juris Publishing

Místo vydání

New York

Kód UT WoS kapitoly

—