Experience with the Application of Article 5(1) of Brussels I Regulation before Czech Courts

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F14%3A00075499" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/14:00075499 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Experience with the Application of Article 5(1) of Brussels I Regulation before Czech Courts

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Free movement of goods, persons and services existing in the EU is mostly realized on the basis of cross-border contracts. With the number of such contracts raises also the number of possible disputes. Brussels I Regulation is the core stone of judicialcooperation in civil matters between the Member States. Czech courts are obliged to apply Brussels I Regulation from 1 May 2004. One of the most often applied provisions of Brussels I Regulation is the Article 5(1) containing the rule of jurisdiction inmatters relating to contracts. This Article has been also often interpreted by the Court of Justice. The aim of this paper is to analyze selected decisions of Czech courts applying the Article 5(1). The paper tries to verify the hypothesis that in applying the Article 5(1) Czech courts largely follow the case law of the Court of Justice.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Experience with the Application of Article 5(1) of Brussels I Regulation before Czech Courts

Popis výsledku anglicky

Free movement of goods, persons and services existing in the EU is mostly realized on the basis of cross-border contracts. With the number of such contracts raises also the number of possible disputes. Brussels I Regulation is the core stone of judicialcooperation in civil matters between the Member States. Czech courts are obliged to apply Brussels I Regulation from 1 May 2004. One of the most often applied provisions of Brussels I Regulation is the Article 5(1) containing the rule of jurisdiction inmatters relating to contracts. This Article has been also often interpreted by the Court of Justice. The aim of this paper is to analyze selected decisions of Czech courts applying the Article 5(1). The paper tries to verify the hypothesis that in applying the Article 5(1) Czech courts largely follow the case law of the Court of Justice.

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

AG - Právní vědy

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2014

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on European Integration 2014

ISBN

9788024833880

ISSN

—

e-ISSN

—

Počet stran výsledku

8

Strana od-do

102-109

Název nakladatele

VŠB - Technical University of Ostrava

Místo vydání

Ostrava

Místo konání akce

Ostrava

Datum konání akce

1. 1. 2014

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

EUR - Evropská akce

Kód UT WoS článku

000346144900010